Improper Input ValidationWeakness · CWE-20

CVE-2025-7507

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The elink – Embed Content plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Malicious Redirect in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to the plugin not restricting URLS that can be supplied through the elink shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to supply an HTML file that can be leverged to redirect users to a malicious domain.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The elink WordPress plugin fails to validate URLs supplied via its shortcode, allowing authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access or higher to inject malicious redirect URLs. When users click links generated by the compromised shortcode, they can be redirected to attacker-controlled malicious domains.

MitigationRestrict the shortcode to only allow trusted/allowlisted domains, implement strict URL validation before generating redirects, and update to a patched version once released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm elink plugin is installed and active
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and verify the elink plugin is installed and activated
    Affected if The elink plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
  2. Identify elink plugin version
    Click on the elink plugin in the Plugins list to view the installed version number
    Affected if Unable to confirm the plugin is running a patched version (no patched version specified in CVE advisory)
  3. Check for elink shortcode usage in content
    Search the wp_posts database table or use a plugin to search for occurrences of the [elink] shortcode in post content
    Affected if The shortcode is present in any posts, pages, or custom post types
  4. Inspect shortcode URL parameters
    Examine posts containing [elink] shortcode and review the URL parameter values being passed (e.g., [elink url="..."]), looking for external or untrusted domains
    Affected if Shortcode attributes contain URLs pointing to domains that are not explicitly allowlisted or validated by the site admin
  5. Review contributor-level user access
    Check WordPress user roles to determine which users have Contributor-level access and whether they can create or edit content containing the shortcode
    Affected if Untrusted Contributor+ users can create or edit content containing the elink shortcode

If the elink plugin is active and Contributor-level or higher users can insert the shortcode with arbitrary URLs into content without server-side validation, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict the shortcode to only allow trusted/allowlisted domains, implement strict URL validation before generating redirects, and update to a patched version once released.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest version of elink – Embed Content plugin (newer than 1.1.0)

  1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Locate the 'elink – Embed Content' plugin
  4. Check if an update is available and install the latest version
  5. Verify the update was successful

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7507 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data