CVE-2025-7510
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in code-projects Modern Bag 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/productadd_back.php. The manipulation of the argument namepro leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the namepro parameter of /admin/productadd_back.php in Modern Bag 1.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the product addition functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Modern Bag application versionCheck the application files for version identifiers, such as version files, headers, or metadata. Look for version strings in the main index page, README files, or configuration files.Affected if The installed version is Modern Bag 1.0 from Code Projects
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsLocate the file /admin/productadd_back.php in the web root directory of the deployed application. Check if this file is present on the server.Affected if The file /admin/productadd_back.php exists in the web application directory
-
Check if the application is network-accessibleDetermine if the web server hosting Modern Bag is accessible over the network, either internally or externally. Attempt to access the /admin/ path via HTTP/HTTPS.Affected if The application is accessible over the network and the /admin/ endpoint responds
-
Inspect the vulnerable parameter handlingExamine the source code of /admin/productadd_back.php and locate the code handling the 'namepro' POST parameter. Look for direct use of this parameter in SQL queries without parameterized queries or prepared statements.Affected if The 'namepro' parameter is used directly in SQL queries without input sanitization or prepared statements
A user is affected if they are running Code Projects Modern Bag version 1.0, the vulnerable file exists on their server, and the application is network-accessible with the 'namepro' parameter being used unsafely in SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the affected file, and conduct a comprehensive audit of the application for additional SQL injection vulnerabilities.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7510 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7510 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data