CVE-2025-7606
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical has been found in code-projects AVL Rooms 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /city.php. The manipulation of the argument city leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in code-projects AVL Rooms 1.0 within the /city.php file. The 'city' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. The public disclosure of this vulnerability means active exploitation is likely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm AVL Rooms installationLocate the web application directory or check running web services for 'avl rooms' or 'anisha avl rooms' deploymentAffected if The application is deployed and accessible on the system
-
Identify installed versionCheck the application's version information - typically in README, version file, or about page - and compare to 1.0Affected if Version is exactly 1.0 (Anisha Avl Rooms)
-
Locate vulnerable fileFind the /city.php file within the web application root directoryAffected if The file /city.php exists in the deployed application
-
Inspect city parameter handlingOpen /city.php and search for SQL query execution involving the 'city' parameter (typically $_GET['city'] or $_POST['city']) without prepared statements or parameter bindingAffected if The code uses the 'city' parameter directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries or input sanitization
-
Test parameter for injectionSend a request to the city.php endpoint with the city parameter containing a SQL test payload (e.g., city=' OR '1'='1) and observe database error responses or unexpected behaviorAffected if The application returns SQL errors or displays unexpected data based on injected SQL syntax
You are affected if Anisha Avl Rooms version 1.0 is deployed with the /city.php file accessible and the 'city' parameter is used in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions involving user input, specifically the 'city' parameter in /city.php. Additionally, apply input validation and output encoding as defense-in-depth measures.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7606 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data