CVE-2025-7609
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in code-projects Simple Shopping Cart 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /register.php. The manipulation of the argument ruser_email leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the /register.php file of Simple Shopping Cart 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the ruser_email parameter. The lack of input sanitization or parameterized queries enables attackers to manipulate database queries, potentially extracting, modifying, or deleting sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Simple Shopping Cart installation and versionLocate the Simple Shopping Cart installation directory and check for version files (such as version.php, README, or composer.json) to confirm the installed version is 1.0Affected if The installed version is Fabian Simple Shopping Cart 1.0
-
Confirm register.php existsCheck the web root or application directory for the presence of the register.php fileAffected if register.php exists in the application directory
-
Determine if registration is accessibleCheck application configuration files for settings that enable or disable user registration, or attempt to access the /register.php endpoint via HTTP requestAffected if Registration functionality is enabled and the register.php page is accessible
-
Inspect ruser_email parameter handlingOpen register.php and locate the code handling the ruser_email POST/GET parameter. Check if the value is directly concatenated into an SQL query or if it uses prepared statements/parameterized queries with bindingAffected if The ruser_email parameter is used in an SQL query without parameterized binding (e.g., direct concatenation like $query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '$ruser_email'")
A user is affected if they are running Fabian Simple Shopping Cart version 1.0 with register.php present and registration enabled, where the ruser_email parameter is not handled via prepared statements in the SQL query.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations in register.php, particularly for the ruser_email parameter. Alternatively, apply vendor-supplied patch if available; until then, disable the registration functionality if possible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7609 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7609 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data