CVE-2025-7640
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe hiWeb Export Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the tool-dashboard-history.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php), via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe hiWeb Export Posts WordPress plugin (versions up to 0.9.0.0) lacks proper nonce validation in tool-dashboard-history.php, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge requests that delete arbitrary files on the server via CSRF. This can lead to RCE by deleting critical files like wp-config.php, but requires tricking a site administrator into clicking a malicious link.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm hiWeb Export Posts plugin is installedLog in to WordPress admin panel, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and look for 'hiWeb Export Posts' in the list of active or inactive pluginsAffected if The plugin appears in the plugin list regardless of status
-
Identify installed plugin versionIn the plugins list, click on 'hiWeb Export Posts' details or view the plugin's main PHP file header to find the version number listed (e.g., 'Version: 0.9.0.0')Affected if The version is 0.9.0.0 or any version up to and including 0.9.0.0 (the vulnerability exists in all versions up to this release)
-
Verify vulnerable file existsAccess the site via FTP or file manager, navigate to /wp-content/plugins/hiweb-export-posts/ and check if tool-dashboard-history.php is presentAffected if The file tool-dashboard-history.php exists in the plugin directory
-
Inspect critical WordPress files for deletion or modificationCheck that wp-config.php, .htaccess, and index.php remain intact in the WordPress root directory; verify file sizes and timestamps match expected valuesAffected if wp-config.php or other critical files are missing, have unexpected timestamps, or show unauthorized modifications
-
Review access logs for file deletion requestsExamine web server access and error logs (apache2/access.log, nginx/access.log) for any POST or GET requests to tool-dashboard-history.php with delete or file parameters, especially from unexpected IP addressesAffected if Log entries show requests to tool-dashboard-history.php with file deletion parameters, indicating potential exploitation attempts
You are affected if the hiWeb Export Posts plugin (versions up to 0.9.0.0) is installed and the vulnerable tool-dashboard-history.php file exists on your server, regardless of whether exploitation has occurred yet.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the patched version when released; if unavailable, remove the plugin entirely. Verify no unauthorized file modifications or compromise occurred.
Latest version available on WordPress plugin repository (newer than 0.9.0.0)
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate the 'hiWeb Export Posts' plugin
- Check if an update is available (the plugin repository should show a newer version)
- If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the patched version
- Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/hiweb-export-posts and upload it manually via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- After updating, verify the plugin is running on a version newer than 0.9.0.0
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7640 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7640 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data