CVE-2025-7645
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the 'delete-file' field in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.8. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server, when an administrator deletes the submission, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Extensions For CF7 WordPress plugin lacks proper path validation in its 'delete-file' field functionality, allowing unauthenticated attackers to manipulate file deletion paths. By exploiting insufficient input sanitization, attackers can delete critical files like wp-config.php, potentially leading to remote code execution through site reinstallation or other attack vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Extensions For CF7 plugin is installedInspect the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'extensions-for-cf7' or similar. Alternatively, query the WordPress database table wp_options for option_name 'active_plugins' and check if the plugin appears in the serialized array.Affected if Plugin folder exists in wp-content/plugins/ or plugin is listed in active_plugins option
-
Determine installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (typically extensions-for-cf7.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and locate the version comment or the version defined in the plugin header. Compare this version number to the fixed version 3.2.9.Affected if Version string found is lower than 3.2.9 or version information is unavailable (indicating older release)
-
Confirm plugin is active on the siteCheck WordPress admin panel under Plugins > Installed Plugins to verify the plugin status. If no admin access, query the wp_options table for the 'active_plugins' option and search for the plugin's main file path.Affected if Plugin appears as active in WordPress admin or plugin path is present in active_plugins option value
-
Inspect HTTP access logs for vulnerable endpoint requestsReview web server access logs (Apache, Nginx, or reverse proxy) for POST or GET requests containing 'delete-file' or 'delete_file' in the URI or request parameters. Example pattern: grep -i 'delete.*file' /var/log/apache2/access.logAffected if Recent or historical requests to delete-file functionality are present in logs, indicating the vulnerable endpoint is reachable
A user is affected if the Extensions For CF7 plugin is installed, active, and running a version prior to 3.2.9, exposing the delete-file functionality to unauthenticated path manipulation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to version 3.2.9 or later when available; if no patch exists, disable the plugin immediately and implement web application firewall rules to block requests to the vulnerable 'delete-file' endpoint.
Version 3.2.9 or later (check WordPress plugin repository for latest release)
- Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate 'Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection)'
- Check if the currently installed version is 3.2.8 or lower
- If vulnerable, click 'Update Now' to update to the latest version, which should be 3.2.9 or higher
- After updating, verify the new version number in the plugins list
- Test that form submissions can still be deleted by administrators (this is the intended function, but ensure it works correctly post-patch)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7645 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7645 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data