CVE-2025-7674
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Input Validation vulnerability in Roche Diagnostics navify Monitoring allows an attacker to manipulate input data, which may lead to a denial of service (DoS) due to negatively impacting the server's performance. This vulnerability has no impact on data confidentiality or integrity. This issue affects navify Monitoring before 1.08.00.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper input validation in Roche Diagnostics navify Monitoring allows attackers to manipulate input data, causing server performance degradation and resulting in denial of service. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied input before processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- Y
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- N
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Green
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify navify Monitoring installation path and versionLocate the navify Monitoring installation directory (commonly in /opt/roche/navify, /Program Files/Roche/navify, or a similar path). Check for a version file, about dialog, or run 'navify --version' if a CLI tool exists. Also check installation logs or the software inventory for version information.Affected if The installed version is below 1.08.00 (e.g., 1.07.x, 1.06.x, or earlier versions).
-
Verify the web interface or API endpoint is exposedCheck if the navify Monitoring web server is running and accessible. Look for configuration files (commonly named server.config, application.properties, or web.config) to determine if HTTP/HTTPS listeners are enabled. Verify network binding settings.Affected if The web interface or API is accessible from network segments accessible to potential attackers, as this is the attack vector for manipulating input data.
-
Review input processing logs for anomaliesExamine application logs (typically found in logs/ or var/log/navify/ directories) for patterns of malformed input, validation errors, or unusual request patterns. Look for entries indicating rejected or unexpected input data.Affected if Logs show frequent input validation errors or unusual request patterns that could indicate exploitation attempts.
-
Check for performance degradation indicatorsMonitor server resource usage (CPU, memory, response times) during normal operation. Compare current performance baselines against historical data. Look for unexplained slowdowns or elevated error rates.Affected if The system shows unexplained performance degradation, elevated CPU usage, or slowed response times that correlate with external input processing.
The environment is affected if navify Monitoring version is below 1.08.00 and the web interface/API is network-accessible, allowing external attackers to send malicious input that triggers the validation flaw and causes denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade navify Monitoring to version 1.08.00 or later to obtain the patched version that properly validates input data and prevents the performance degradation attack vector.
navify Monitoring version 1.08.00
- Identify the current version of Roche Diagnostics navify Monitoring installed in your environment
- Plan and schedule the upgrade during a maintenance window
- Upgrade navify Monitoring to version 1.08.00 or later
- After upgrade, verify that the navify Monitoring service starts successfully
- Test that the monitoring functionality works correctly with valid input data
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7674 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7674 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data