CVE-2025-7696
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Integration for Pipedrive and Contact Form 7, WPForms, Elementor, Ninja Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.3 via deserialization of untrusted input within the verify_field_val() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. The additional presence of a POP chain in the Contact Form 7 plugin, which is likely to be used alongside, allows attackers to delete arbitrary files, leading to a denial of service or remote code execution when the wp-config.php file is deleted.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Integration for Pipedrive and Contact Form 7, WPForms, Elementor, Ninja Forms WordPress plugin up to version 1.2.3 contains a PHP Object Injection vulnerability in the verify_field_val() function through unsafe deserialization of untrusted input. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject PHP objects. When combined with a POP chain present in Contact Form 7 (which is commonly used alongside this plugin), attackers can delete arbitrary files including wp-config.php, leading to denial of service or remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of the Pipedrive integration pluginLocate the plugin folder (typically wp-content/plugins/pipedrive-for-cf7-wpforms-elementor-ninja-forms or similar) and check the main plugin PHP file header for the 'Version' field, or query it via wp-cli: wp plugin list --search='pipedrive' --format=jsonAffected if The installed version is 1.2.3 or lower (the vulnerability affects versions up to 1.2.3)
-
Confirm Contact Form 7 is installedCheck for the Contact Form 7 plugin in wp-content/plugins/ or query via wp-cli: wp plugin list --search='contact-form-7' --format=jsonAffected if Contact Form 7 is present alongside the vulnerable plugin (required for the POP chain to achieve file deletion)
-
Verify the plugin is activeCheck plugin status via WordPress admin dashboard or wp-cli: wp plugin status pipedrive-for-cf7-wpforms-elementor-ninja-formsAffected if The plugin is active (the vulnerability is exploitable only on active plugins)
-
Inspect the verify_field_val() function for unsafe deserializationExamine the plugin source code, specifically the verify_field_val() function, and look for unserialize() calls handling untrusted input without prior validationAffected if The code contains unserialize() on user-supplied input without sanitization (indicates the vulnerable code path exists)
-
Check web server logs for exploitation attemptsReview access logs for patterns containing serialized PHP objects in POST/GET parameters, particularly around the plugin's AJAX or form-handling endpointsAffected if Logs show requests with serialized object data or known POP chain indicators targeting the plugin endpoint
Your environment is affected if the Pipedrive integration plugin version is 1.2.3 or lower, the plugin is active, and Contact Form 7 is installed, allowing unauthenticated PHP object injection that can leverage the CF7 POP chain to delete files or achieve RCE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to version 1.2.4 or later immediately. If immediate update is not possible, disable the plugin or implement WAF rules to block deserialization attack patterns at the web application layer.
Latest version newer than 1.2.3 (check WordPress plugin repository for version 1.2.4 or later)
- Check the current version of the 'Integration for Pipedrive and Contact Form 7, WPForms, Elementor, Ninja Forms' plugin installed on your WordPress site
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- Locate the plugin and note the current version number
- If the installed version is 1.2.3 or earlier, update the plugin to the latest available version
- After updating, verify the plugin is running on a version newer than 1.2.3
- Consider reviewing user roles and permissions to limit exposure until the patch is applied
- If immediate update is not possible, consider disabling the plugin temporarily
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7696 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7696 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data