SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-7735

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Hospital Information System developed by UNIMAX has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read database contents.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Hospital Information System developed by UNIMAX contains a SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands, potentially enabling unauthorized access to sensitive patient and system data stored in the database.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements to sanitize all user inputs, apply input validation, and apply any vendor patches if available from UNIMAX.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify UNIMAX Hospital Information System installation
    Search the system for files, binaries, or web applications named 'UNIMAX' or related to 'Hospital Information System'. Check installed software listings, web server document roots, or application directories for UNIMAX components.
    Affected if The UNIMAX Hospital Information System is present in the environment
  2. Determine the installed version
    Locate version information in the application (typically in 'About' pages, configuration files, header files, or the application binary). Compare against any version ranges provided by the vendor.
    Affected if A specific version is installed that matches known vulnerable versions (if version ranges become available)
  3. Verify network accessibility of the application
    Determine if the web interface or API endpoints of the Hospital Information System are accessible from external networks without authentication. Check firewall rules, network segmentation, and exposed ports/services.
    Affected if The application is reachable by unauthenticated remote attackers over the network
  4. Identify user input points in the application
    Review web forms, API parameters, search fields, login pages, and patient query interfaces where users can submit data. These are potential SQL injection entry points.
    Affected if User input fields accept unauthenticated queries without visible input sanitization
  5. Confirm lack of parameterized query implementation
    Inspect application source code or configuration for use of parameterized queries/prepared statements in database interactions. Check if raw SQL concatenation with user input exists in authentication or data retrieval functions.
    Affected if User-supplied input is directly concatenated into SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization

If the UNIMAX Hospital Information System is installed, exposed to unauthenticated network access, and contains direct SQL query construction with user input, the environment is likely affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries or prepared statements to sanitize all user inputs, apply input validation, and apply any vendor patches if available from UNIMAX.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7735 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7735 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data