Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2025-7769

HIGH · 8.7 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-08-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Tigo Energy's CCA is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the /cgi-bin/mobile_api endpoint when the DEVICE_PING command is called, allowing remote code execution due to improper handling of user input. When used with default credentials, this enables attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the device that could cause potential unauthorized access, service disruption, and data exposure.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Tigo Energy's CCA contains a command injection vulnerability in the /cgi-bin/mobile_api endpoint when processing the DEVICE_PING command. The application fails to properly sanitize user input before passing it to system shell commands, allowing authenticated attackers (using default credentials) to execute arbitrary operating system commands remotely.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and use parameterized commands or whitelist-based filtering to prevent shell metacharacter injection in the DEVICE_PING command handler. Additionally, change default credentials immediately and disable unused administrative interfaces.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Tigo Energy CCA installation
    Identify if the target system is running Tigo Energy's Cloud Connect Advanced (CCA) solution. Check system documentation, device labels, or network inventory for the product name and version.
    Affected if The system is confirmed to be a Tigo Energy CCA device or software installation.
  2. Verify mobile_api endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access or probe the /cgi-bin/mobile_api endpoint on the affected system using HTTP/HTTPS requests. This may require authentication depending on the configuration.
    Affected if The /cgi-bin/mobile_api endpoint responds and accepts commands, indicating the vulnerable interface is exposed.
  3. Check for default credentials in use
    Review authentication configuration to determine if the system's administrative or API credentials are still set to manufacturer defaults. Attempt login with common default credential pairs if authorized.
    Affected if Default credentials are still active, allowing authenticated access required for exploiting the DEVICE_PING command.
  4. Confirm DEVICE_PING command availability
    If authenticated access is possible, verify that the DEVICE_PING command functionality is present and enabled within the mobile_api interface. This may require examining available API commands or documentation.
    Affected if The DEVICE_PING command is available and can be invoked through the mobile_api endpoint.
  5. Inspect input sanitization in command handling
    Examine how the DEVICE_PING command processes input parameters. If source code or configuration is accessible, review the command handler for lack of input validation or direct shell command construction.
    Affected if User-supplied input in DEVICE_PING is passed directly to system shell calls without proper sanitization or parameterized execution.

A system is affected if it is running Tigo Energy CCA with the mobile_api endpoint exposed, default credentials still active, DEVICE_PING command available, and no input validation implemented in the command handler.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and use parameterized commands or whitelist-based filtering to prevent shell metacharacter injection in the DEVICE_PING command handler. Additionally, change default credentials immediately and disable unused administrative interfaces.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7769 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7769 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data