CVE-2025-7798
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Beijing Shenzhou Shihan Technology Multimedia Integrated Business Display System up to 8.2. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/system/structure/getdirectorydata/web/baseinfo/companyManage. The manipulation of the argument Struccture_ID leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Multimedia Integrated Business Display System allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the Struccture_ID parameter in the /admin/system/structure/getdirectorydata/web/baseinfo/companyManage endpoint. The vulnerability exists in version 8.2 and below, enabling attackers to manipulate database queries by injecting arbitrary SQL code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the applicationLocate and confirm the Multimedia Integrated Business Display System is installed in your environment. Check application inventory or running services for this product name.Affected if The Multimedia Integrated Business Display System is present and running.
-
Check the installed versionDetermine the exact version number of the Multimedia Integrated Business Display System. Consult the application's about page, installation logs, or version file. Compare your version against the affected range: version 8.2 and below.Affected if The installed version is 8.2 or any version lower than 8.2.
-
Verify endpoint exposureTest if the /admin/system/structure/getdirectorydata/web/baseinfo/companyManage endpoint is accessible from your network. Attempt a GET request to this path on your server.Affected if The endpoint responds and is accessible (even if authentication is required).
-
Confirm parameter acceptanceSend a request to the endpoint including the Struccture_ID parameter with a test value (such as Struccture_ID=1). Observe if the application processes this parameter without error or validation feedback.Affected if The Struccture_ID parameter is accepted and processed by the application.
Your environment is affected if the Multimedia Integrated Business Display System version is 8.2 or below AND the /admin/system/structure/getdirectorydata/web/baseinfo/companyManage endpoint is accessible with the Struccture_ID parameter in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements, implement strict input validation on the Struccture_ID parameter, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7798 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data