CVE-2025-7850
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA command injection vulnerability may be exploited after the admin's authentication on the web portal on Omada gateways.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the web portal interface of TP-Link Omada gateways. An authenticated administrator can potentially inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands through the vulnerable web interface, leading to full compromise of the gateway device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3.3= 1.3.3< 1.1.0= 1.1.0< 1.3.1= 1.3.1< 2.2.2= 2.2.2< 2.3.1= 2.3.1< 1.2.1= 1.2.1< 1.2.1= 1.2.1< 2.1.3= 2.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the TP-Link Omada gateway modelLog into the Omada web portal and navigate to System > System Info or check the device label/quick start guide. Look for the model name such as ER8411, ER7412 M2, ER707 M2, ER7206, ER605, ER706w, or ER7212PC.Affected if The device model matches one of the affected models listed in the CVE (ER8411, ER7412 M2, ER707 M2, ER7206, ER605, ER706w, ER706w 4G, ER7212PC).
-
Locate the firmware version in the web interfaceIn the Omada web portal, go to System > System Info or Settings > Firmware Upgrade. The current firmware version is displayed on this page.Affected if The displayed firmware version is equal to or lower than the vulnerable version for your model: ER8411 (1.3.3), ER7412 M2 (1.1.0), ER707 M2 (1.3.1), ER7206 (2.2.2), ER605 (2.3.1), ER706w (1.2.1), ER7212PC (2.1.3).
-
Verify the web portal is network accessibleConfirm that the Omada gateway web management interface (typically ports 80 or 443) is reachable from network segments beyond the trusted administration network.Affected if The web portal is accessible from untrusted networks, increasing exposure to unauthenticated or compromised attackers who could attempt credential theft.
You are affected if you have a TP-Link Omada gateway model listed in the CVE and your current firmware version is equal to or lower than the version specified for that model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.01.2.11.3.1
Restrict administrative access to the Omada gateway web portal to trusted IP addresses or networks, implement strong admin credentials, and apply vendor-supplied firmware updates once available. Network segmentation can limit exposure if the gateway is compromised.
Er8411: upgrade to firmware > 1.3.3; Er7412 M2: upgrade to firmware > 1.1.0; Er707 M2: upgrade to firmware > 1.3.1; Er7206: upgrade to firmware > 2.2.2; Er605: upgrade to firmware > 2.3.1; Er706w: upgrade to firmware > 1.2.1; Er706w 4g: upgrade to firmware > 1.2.1; Er7212pc: upgrade to firmware > 2.
- 1. Identify the exact model number of your Omada gateway from the device label or web UI.
- 2. Access the Omada gateway's web management interface using an admin account.
- 3. Navigate to System > Firmware Upgrade (or similar path depending on model).
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version for your model from TP-Link's official support site (www.tp-link.com).
- 5. Upload the firmware file through the web interface and initiate the upgrade.
- 6. Wait for the device to reboot and verify the new firmware version in the web UI.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the command injection vulnerability is resolved by confirming normal operation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7850 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7850 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data