CVE-2025-7911
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical was found in D-Link DI-8100 1.0. This vulnerability affects the function sprintf of the file /upnp_ctrl.asp of the component jhttpd. The manipulation of the argument remove_ext_proto/remove_ext_port leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the D-Link DI-8100 router (version 1.0) within the jhttpd web server component. The unsafe sprintf function in /upnp_ctrl.asp does not properly validate the length of the remove_ext_proto and remove_ext_port arguments, allowing an attacker to overflow the stack buffer. This critical flaw is remotely exploitable without authentication and may allow remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the router web interface (typically http://192.168.0.1) and navigate to System > Status or Device Info to find the firmware version. Alternatively, check via CLI if accessible, or look for version sticker on device.Affected if Firmware version is exactly 1.0 (the only affected version listed)
-
Confirm jhttpd web server is runningUse a network scanner or check router status page to verify the web server service is active. You can also attempt to access the router's web interface from a connected host.Affected if The web server is accessible and responding on HTTP/HTTPS ports (default 80/443)
-
Verify UPnP is enabledLog into the router web interface and navigate to Advanced > UPnP or similar section to check if Universal Plug and Play is turned on. The vulnerable code path in /upnp_ctrl.asp handles UPnP port forwarding configuration.Affected if UPnP feature is enabled on the device
-
Check for presence of vulnerable endpointAttempt to access http://<router-ip>/upnp_ctrl.asp from a connected client. This endpoint handles remove_ext_proto and remove_ext_port parameters.Affected if The /upnp_ctrl.asp page returns successfully (status 200) and accepts parameters
The device is affected if it is a D-Link DI-8100 router running firmware version 1.0 with the web server and UPnP both enabled, allowing access to the vulnerable /upnp_ctrl.asp endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor firmware patch when available; if no patch exists, consider network segmentation, disabling UPnP, or replacing the device, as this critical flaw is actively being exploited.
- 1. Check D-Link's official support page for the DI-8100 for any available firmware updates
- 2. If no official firmware update is available, consider replacing the device as DI-8100 may be End-of-Life (EOL)
- 3. If the device must remain in service, implement network-level filtering to block external access to UPnP services (port 1900 and any custom ports)
- 4. Disable UPnP functionality in the device configuration if possible
- 5. Place the device behind a properly configured firewall with restrictive inbound rules
- 6. Monitor for any security advisories from D-Link regarding this vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7911 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7911 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data