CVE-2025-8027
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn 64-bit platforms IonMonkey-JIT only wrote 32 bits of the 64-bit return value space on the stack. Baseline-JIT, however, read the entire 64 bits. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 141, Firefox ESR 115.26, Firefox ESR 128.13, Firefox ESR 140.1, Thunderbird 141, Thunderbird 128.13, and Thunderbird 140.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOn 64-bit platforms, the IonMonkey JIT compiler only wrote 32 bits of the 64-bit return value space on the stack, while the Baseline-JIT compiler read the entire 64 bits. This mismatch causes uninitialized or leftover stack data in the upper 32 bits to be consumed, potentially leading to information disclosure or undefined behavior.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 115.26.0< 141.0>= 128.0, < 128.13.0>= 140.0, < 140.1.0< 128.13.0< 141.0>= 140.0, < 140.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Firefox versionOpen about:firefox in the address bar or go to Help > About Firefox. Note the version number displayed.Affected if The version is less than 115.26.0, or between 128.0.0 and 128.12.x, or between 140.0.0 and 140.0.x, or less than 141.0 on the initial release branch.
-
Check installed Thunderbird versionOpen About Thunderbird from the Help menu. Note the version number displayed.Affected if The version is less than 128.13.0, or between 140.0.0 and 140.0.x, or less than 141.0 on the initial release branch.
-
Confirm 64-bit platformCheck the system architecture. On Windows, verify the build is x64 in Help > About or Task Manager. On macOS, check System Report for Intel x86_64 or Apple Silicon. On Linux, run 'uname -m' - x86_64 indicates 64-bit.Affected if The system is running a 32-bit (i686, i386) build - the vulnerability only affects 64-bit platforms.
-
Verify JIT compiler is enabledIn Firefox, go to about:config and search for 'javascript.options.jit'. The setting 'javascript.options.jit' should be true (enabled by default). IonMonkey is the JIT engine.Affected if JIT is explicitly disabled via about:config setting javascript.options.jit set to false - the flaw requires IonMonkey to be active.
A user is affected if they run an affected Firefox or Thunderbird version (pre-115.26.0, pre-128.13.0, pre-140.1.0, or pre-141.0) on a 64-bit platform with JIT compilation enabled (the default state).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped115.26.0128.13.0140.1.0
Update affected Firefox and Thunderbird installations to the patched versions (Firefox 141+, Firefox ESR 115.26+, Firefox ESR 128.13+, Firefox ESR 140.1+, Thunderbird 141+, Thunderbird 128.13+, Thunderbird 140.1+).
Firefox 141 (or ESR 115.26/128.13/140.1 depending on release channel); Thunderbird 141 (or 128.13/140.1 depending on release channel)
- Check current Firefox or Thunderbird version via Help > About (or firefox --version / thunderbird --version from command line)
- Download the appropriate fixed version from https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ or https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/all/
- Install the new version, which will overwrite the existing installation
- Restart the application after installation
- Verify the version has been updated to a fixed release (115.26.0+, 128.13.0+, 140.1.0+, or 141.0+)
- Enable automatic updates via Settings > Advanced > Update to ensure future security patches are applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8027 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8027 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data