CVE-2025-8065
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in the ONVIF SOAP XML Parser in Tapo C200 v3 and C520WS v2.6. When processing XML tags with namespace prefixes, the parser fails to validate the prefix length before copying it to a fixed-size stack buffer. It allowed a crafted SOAP request with an oversized namespace prefix to cause memory corruption in stack. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network may exploit this flaw to enable remote code execution with elevated privileges, leading to full compromise of the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in the ONVIF SOAP XML parser in Tapo C200 v3 and C520WS v2.6. When processing XML tags with namespace prefixes, the parser does not validate prefix length before copying to a fixed-size stack buffer, allowing memory corruption and potential remote code execution by unauthenticated attackers on the same local network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.3.7= 1.3.9= 1.3.11= 1.3.13= 1.3.14= 1.3.15= 1.4.1= 1.4.2= 1.4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelCheck the physical device label or access the device web interface to confirm the model is Tapo C200 or C520WSAffected if Device is Tapo C200 or C520WS
-
Check firmware versionAccess the device settings page or use the Tapo app to view the firmware version. Compare against affected versions: 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.3.7, 1.3.9, 1.3.11, 1.3.13, 1.3.14, 1.3.15, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.4.4 for C200, or 2.6 for C520WSAffected if Firmware version matches one of the listed affected versions
-
Verify ONVIF service is enabledAccess the device web interface and check if ONVIF protocol support is enabled in the settings, or use an ONVIF discovery tool to probe the deviceAffected if ONVIF service is active and accessible on the network
-
Assess network accessibilityReview network configuration to determine if the device is reachable from untrusted network segments. An attacker on the same local network can send malicious SOAP/XML requestsAffected if The device is accessible from network segments with untrusted users
If the device is a Tapo C200 or C520WS with an affected firmware version and ONVIF is enabled and accessible on the network, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-8065
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIsolate affected devices on a restricted network segment and monitor for vendor firmware updates to address the missing input validation in the XML parser.
Any firmware version newer than 1.3.7 that includes the security fix for CVE-2025-8065 (contact TP-Link support for specific fixed version)
- Check TP-Link's official support page (www.tp-link.com) for the Tapo C200 firmware downloads
- Look for firmware versions newer than 1.3.7 that address security vulnerabilities
- Download and install the latest available firmware version for Tapo C200
- After upgrading, verify the device is functioning normally
- Confirm the new firmware version is no longer affected by checking the release notes or security advisory
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8065 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8065 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data