CVE-2025-8105
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe The Soledad theme for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 8.6.7. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Soledad theme for WordPress fails to validate user input before passing it to the do_shortcode() function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary shortcodes. Since shortcodes can trigger various plugin/theme functionalities including potentially dangerous PHP execution paths, this enables severe attacks without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Soledad theme is installedNavigate to wp-content/themes/ in your WordPress installation directory and verify the soledad folder existsAffected if The soledad folder exists in the themes directory
-
Check if Soledad theme is activeLog into WordPress admin panel, go to Appearance > Themes, and note whether Soledad is the currently active themeAffected if Soledad theme is activated on the site
-
Determine installed Soledad versionOpen wp-content/themes/soledad/style.css and locate the 'Version:' header in the theme comment block at the top of the fileAffected if The version displayed is 8.6.7 or lower
-
Compare version to fixed releaseCompare the version found in step 3 against version 8.6.7 - any version greater than 8.6.7 contains the fixAffected if Installed version is 8.6.7 or lower, meaning the vulnerability is present in the theme code
-
Verify shortcode processing exposureReview theme PHP files (particularly functions.php and any custom shortcode handlers) for instances where user-supplied input is passed directly to do_shortcode() without sanitizationAffected if The theme code contains unsanitized do_shortcode() calls processing user input
If Soledad theme is active and the installed version is 8.6.7 or lower, the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated shortcode injection attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Soledad theme to a version newer than 8.6.7. If immediate updating is not possible, implement web application firewall rules to block requests containing shortcode patterns or temporarily switch to a secure alternative theme.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8105 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data