CVE-2025-8107
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn OceanBase's Oracle tenant mode, a malicious user with specific privileges can achieve privilege escalation to SYS-level access by executing carefully crafted commands. This vulnerability only affects OceanBase tenants in Oracle mode. Tenants in MySQL mode are unaffected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn OceanBase's Oracle tenant mode, a user with specific database privileges can execute crafted commands to escalate privileges to SYS-level access, the highest privileged user in Oracle. This is a privilege escalation vulnerability specific to Oracle mode tenants.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Oracle tenant mode is in useQuery OceanBase for tenant mode configuration: SELECT * FROM oceanbase.gv$tenant WHERE tenant_type='ORACLE'; or check tenant creation logs/config for tenant_type parameter set to 'ORACLE'.Affected if The environment uses Oracle mode tenants - the CVE only affects Oracle tenant mode, not MySQL mode.
-
Check for users with database privileges in Oracle tenantIn Oracle tenant, query: SELECT username, granted_role FROM dba_role_privs; SELECT username, privilege FROM dba_sys_privs; Look for non-SYS users with DBA, CONNECT, RESOURCE, or other elevated roles.Affected if Non-SYS users possess elevated database privileges (DBA, CONNECT, RESOURCE, etc.) that could be exploited for privilege escalation.
-
Verify current SYS authentication configurationCheck Oracle tenant authentication settings: SELECT * FROM dba_users WHERE username='SYS'; Review authentication type and account status.Affected if SYS account is accessible or improperly secured, allowing potential escalation to SYS-level access.
-
Audit recent privilege escalation attemptsReview OceanBase audit logs for Oracle tenant: Look for queries accessing SYS-owned objects, privilege grant operations, or authentication changes. Query: SELECT * FROM oceanbase.gv$sql_audit WHERE tenant_id IN (SELECT tenant_id FROM oceanbase.gv$tenant WHERE tenant_type='ORACLE') AND sql_text LIKE '%SYS.%';Affected if Audit logs show suspicious activity involving SYS schema access or privilege modifications in Oracle tenants.
-
Check for vulnerable privilege configurationsIn Oracle tenant, check for any misconfigured stored procedures, roles, or database links that could allow privilege escalation: SELECT * FROM dba_procedures WHERE owner='PUBLIC'; SELECT * FROM dba_db_links;Affected if Public procedures, database links, or roles exist that could be manipulated for SYS privilege escalation.
A user is affected if they run OceanBase with Oracle tenant mode enabled and have non-SYS users with elevated database privileges that could be exploited to gain SYS-level access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch when available and ensure Oracle tenant mode users follow least-privilege principles. Consider additional monitoring for privilege escalation attempts in Oracle mode tenants.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8107 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8107 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data