CVE-2025-8142
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Soledad theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Local File Inclusion in all versions up to, and including, 8.6.7 via the 'header_layout' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to include and execute arbitrary .php files on the server, allowing the execution of any PHP code in those files. This can be used to bypass access controls, obtain sensitive data, or achieve code execution in cases where .php file types can be uploaded and included.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Soledad WordPress theme up to version 8.6.7 contains a Local File Inclusion vulnerability in the 'header_layout' parameter. Authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access or higher can manipulate this parameter to include and execute arbitrary .php files on the server, achieving remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Soledad theme installationLocate the Soledad theme folder in your WordPress installation (typically at wp-content/themes/soledad/). Check the style.css file within that folder for the 'Version:' header, or query it via WordPress admin under Appearance > Themes.Affected if The Soledad theme is installed and the version displayed is 8.6.7 or lower.
-
Confirm header_layout parameter usageSearch your WordPress theme files (especially header.php, functions.php, or any layout-related template files) for references to 'header_layout' or $_GET/$_REQUEST calls that use this parameter name.Affected if The theme code reads and processes the 'header_layout' parameter from user input without proper sanitization.
-
Audit WordPress user rolesNavigate to Users > All Users in the WordPress admin dashboard and review the list of users. Identify any accounts assigned the Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator roles.Affected if There is at least one user account with Contributor-level access or higher, as this role is required to exploit the vulnerability.
-
Review access logs for exploitation attemptsExamine your web server access logs (Apache, Nginx, or reverse proxy logs) for requests to WordPress pages that include 'header_layout=' with paths containing '../' or '/wp-content/', '/wp-includes/', or '.php' file extensions.Affected if Recent or historical HTTP requests contain the 'header_layout' parameter with directory traversal patterns or file path values.
-
Check for code patterns in theme filesGrep the Soledad theme directory for patterns like 'include($_REQUEST', 'include($_GET', or 'require($_REQUEST' combined with 'header_layout' to confirm the vulnerable inclusion mechanism.Affected if The theme directly includes files based on the 'header_layout' parameter without validating the included path.
You are affected if the Soledad theme is installed at version 8.6.7 or lower AND the 'header_layout' parameter is processed by the theme AND at least one Contributor-level user account exists in your WordPress installation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Soledad theme to the latest patched version. Additionally, implement strict input validation and whitelist-based filtering on the 'header_layout' parameter to prevent path traversal attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8142 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8142 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data