CVE-2025-8418
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe B Slider- Gutenberg Slider Block for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary Plugin Installation in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.30. This is due to missing capability checks on the activated_plugin function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to install arbitrary plugins on the server which can make remote code execution possible.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe B Slider plugin for WordPress has a missing authorization vulnerability in its plugin activation functionality. The activated_plugin function lacks capability checks, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level permissions (the lowest WordPress role) to install and activate arbitrary plugins on the server. This can lead to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify B Slider plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and search for 'B Slider' or check the wp-content/plugins directory for a folder named 'b-slider' or similarAffected if The B Slider plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed B Slider versionIn WordPress admin Plugins list, find B Slider and note the version number displayed, or read the main plugin PHP file header for the 'Version' fieldAffected if The version is lower than 1.1.31 or if the version cannot be determined (older/unmaintained plugin)
-
Verify user registration settingsIn WordPress admin, go to Settings > General and check 'Membership: Anyone can register' setting, or query wp_options table for 'users_can_register' valueAffected if User registration is enabled with 'Subscriber' as the default role
-
Check for subscriber-level accountsIn WordPress admin under Users, filter by role 'Subscriber', or query the wp_usermeta table for users with wp_capabilities containing 'subscriber'Affected if Any subscriber-level user accounts exist in the system
You are affected if B Slider plugin is installed and active, the version is below 1.1.31, and subscriber-level user accounts can exist (registration enabled or existing subscribers present).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to version 1.1.31 or later. Until an update is available, disable the plugin or restrict user registration to prevent subscriber-level account creation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8418 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8418 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data