dbcve.org
Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2025-8886

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Missing Authorization, Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Usta Information Systems Inc. Aybs Interaktif allows Privilege Abuse, Authentication Bypass. This issue affects Aybs Interaktif: from 2024 through 28082025.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Aybs Interaktif contains multiple authorization flaws including incorrect permission assignments for critical resources, exposure of sensitive information to unauthorized actors, missing authorization checks, and incorrect authorization implementation. These combined issues enable privilege abuse and authentication bypass, allowing attackers to access functions or data beyond their authorized scope.

MitigationImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) with consistent authorization checks across all endpoints, review and fix permission assignments for critical resources, and ensure sensitive data is only exposed to appropriately authorized users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Aybs Interaktif installation and version
    Search for Aybs Interaktif application files, configuration files, or service banners. Check installed packages, application directories, or service metadata for version information.
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or falls within an unknown vulnerable range since no specific version data is provided.
  2. Review user role definitions and permission mappings
    Examine the application's role-based access control (RBAC) configuration, user role definitions, and permission assignment tables. Look for role-to-permission mappings in config files, databases, or code.
    Affected if Roles have permissions that appear misaligned with least-privilege principles, or critical functions are accessible to standard/low-privilege users.
  3. Test for unauthorized access to sensitive endpoints
    Attempt to access administrative functions, data export features, user management panels, or other sensitive endpoints using a low-privilege or unauthenticated account.
    Affected if Access is granted to resources or functions beyond the test account's authorized scope.
  4. Inspect API endpoints and data exposure
    Review API responses, error messages, and debug output when accessing various application endpoints. Check if sensitive data (user info, system details, configuration) is returned to unauthorized users.
    Affected if Sensitive information is returned in responses to users who should not have access to that data.
  5. Verify authorization checks on critical functions
    Examine application logs, code, or configuration for consistency of authorization validation across different application functions. Compare high-privilege operations vs. standard operations.
    Affected if Some endpoints or functions lack visible authorization validation while others enforce it, indicating incomplete coverage.

A defender is affected if the Aybs Interaktif installation shows evidence of missing or bypassed authorization controls, improper permission assignments, or data exposure to unauthorized users, regardless of version.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper role-based access control (RBAC) with consistent authorization checks across all endpoints, review and fix permission assignments for critical resources, and ensure sensitive data is only exposed to appropriately authorized users.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation20.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
42.0 hours of engineering $7,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-8886 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-8886 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data