CVE-2025-9024
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System 1.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /book-appointment.php. The manipulation of the argument Message leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System 1.1 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the Message parameter in /book-appointment.php. The application fails to properly sanitize user input before using it in database queries, potentially enabling data exfiltration, authentication bypass, or remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm application installationLocate the PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System files on the server. Look for directories containing 'beauty-parlour' or 'parlour' in the web root. Check for the presence of book-appointment.php.Affected if The application is installed and accessible on the server with version 1.1 confirmed.
-
Verify installed versionCheck the application's version information. This may be in a README file, version config file, or footer of the application pages. Compare against the affected version 1.1.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.1.
-
Locate vulnerable endpointConfirm that /book-appointment.php exists and is accessible on the web server. This is the file containing the vulnerable Message parameter.Affected if The file book-appointment.php is present and accessible via HTTP/HTTPS.
-
Identify database interactionCheck if the application is connected to a MySQL database. Review the database configuration file (commonly config.php, db.php, or similar in the application root) to confirm database credentials and connection details.Affected if The application uses a MySQL database and processes the Message parameter through database queries.
The environment is affected if PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System version 1.1 is installed with the book-appointment.php file present and connected to a database, allowing user-supplied Message input to reach unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized statements/prepared statements and implement proper input validation on the Message parameter and all user-supplied inputs. Conduct a comprehensive code audit to identify additional SQL injection vulnerabilities.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9024 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data