dbcve.org
Improper Input ValidationWeakness · CWE-20

CVE-2025-9060

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
97/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in the  MSoft MFlash application that allows execution of arbitrary code on the server. The issue occurs in the integration configuration functionality that is only available to MFlash administrators. The vulnerability is related to insufficient validation of parameters when setting up security components. This issue affects MFlash v. 8.0 and possibly others. To mitigate apply 8.2-653 hotfix 11.06.2025 and above.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

MSoft MFlash versions 8.0 and possibly others contain a code injection vulnerability in the admin-only integration configuration functionality. Insufficient validation of parameters when setting up security components allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary code on the server.

MitigationApply vendor hotfix 8.2-653 (released 11.06.2025) or later to address the insufficient parameter validation in the integration configuration feature.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MFlash installation and version
    Locate the MFlash installation directory and check the version file or executable properties. Common locations may include the application root directory or system-installed paths. Use 'grep' or file inspection to find version information.
    Affected if Installed version is 8.0 or falls within an unpatched version range before 8.2-653
  2. Confirm admin access to MFlash
    Verify that your user account has administrative privileges within the MFlash application. Check user role assignments in the admin panel or user management section.
    Affected if Your account has administrator-level access to MFlash
  3. Locate integration configuration feature
    Navigate to the admin panel and identify the integration configuration functionality for security components. This may be under Settings, Integration, or Security configuration menus.
    Affected if The integration configuration feature is present and accessible in your installation
  4. Check if feature is enabled
    Inspect the integration configuration settings to determine if the feature is actively enabled. Look for toggle switches, status indicators, or configuration states in the admin interface.
    Affected if The integration configuration for security components is enabled

You are affected if MFlash version 8.0 is installed, you have admin access, and the integration configuration feature for security components is enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor hotfix 8.2-653 (released 11.06.2025) or later to address the insufficient parameter validation in the integration configuration feature.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

MFlash 8.2-653 or later

  1. Identify the current MFlash version currently deployed in your environment
  2. Obtain MFlash version 8.2-653 hotfix (released June 11, 2025) or a later stable release from the official MSoft vendor
  3. Follow the vendor's standard upgrade procedure to apply the 8.2-653 hotfix or later version
  4. After upgrade, verify the version has been successfully applied via MFlash version information
  5. Test the integration configuration functionality to confirm the vulnerability is remediated

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,770
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9060 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data