Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2025-9114

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Doccure theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary User Password Change in versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to the plugin providing user-controlled access to objects, letting a user bypass authorization and access system resources. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change user passwords and potentially take over administrator accounts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Doccure WordPress theme before version 1.5.1 contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass authorization and change arbitrary user passwords. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before processing password change requests, enabling full administrator account takeover.

MitigationUpgrade Doccure theme to version 1.5.1 or later. Until patched, consider disabling the theme or implementing web application firewall rules to block password reset/change endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Doccure theme is installed
    Check if the Doccure theme exists in your WordPress installation by looking in the wp-content/themes/ directory for a folder named 'doccure' or similar theme folder.
    Affected if The Doccure theme directory is present in your WordPress themes folder.
  2. Identify the installed Doccure theme version
    Open the theme's style.css file typically found at wp-content/themes/doccure/style.css and locate the 'Version:' header in the comment block at the top of the file. Record the version number.
    Affected if The version listed is 1.5.0 or any version lower than 1.5.0.
  3. Determine if password reset functionality is exposed
    Test whether unauthenticated requests can access the password change endpoint. This typically involves sending a request to your site's password reset or user update mechanism without providing authentication credentials. Look for any REST API endpoints or AJAX handlers that handle password changes.
    Affected if The password change or reset functionality responds to unauthenticated requests without requiring login credentials.
  4. Verify if arbitrary user password modification is possible
    Attempt to modify a known user account password using an unauthenticated request, observing whether the application accepts the request without verifying the requester's identity or requiring a valid nonce/token.
    Affected if You can successfully change a user's password without being logged in or without providing valid authentication.

You are affected if the Doccure theme is installed at version 1.5.0 or earlier AND the password change functionality is accessible to unauthenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Doccure theme to version 1.5.1 or later. Until patched, consider disabling the theme or implementing web application firewall rules to block password reset/change endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9114 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9114 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data