CVE-2025-9148
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in CodePhiliaX Chat2DB up to 0.3.7. This affects an unknown function of the file ai/chat2db/server/web/api/controller/data/source/DataSourceController.java of the component JDBC Connection Handler. The manipulation results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the JDBC Connection Handler of CodePhiliaX Chat2DB's DataSourceController.java allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input in database connection operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Chat2DB is installedSearch for Chat2DB installation directories or executables (e.g., look for 'chat2db' folders, .jar files, or the application in common installation paths like /opt, /usr/local, or user's home directories)Affected if Chat2DB software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed Chat2DB versionLocate version information in the installation (check VERSION files, pom.xml, build.gradle, or launch scripts; or run the application with --version if supported)Affected if The installed version cannot be confirmed as patched (version unknown or falls within the vulnerable release range)
-
Verify the JDBC DataSourceController component existsInspect the application installation for DataSourceController.java or its compiled class file in the JDBC connection handling modulesAffected if The vulnerable DataSourceController.java file is present in the codebase
-
Confirm database connection features are in useCheck application configuration files (e.g., application.yml, application.properties) for configured database connections or datasourcesAffected if Database connections or JDBC datasource configurations are defined and active
-
Check if remote/network access to Chat2DB is enabledReview network configuration, firewall rules, or application bind settings to determine if the Chat2DB interface is exposed to network or remote connectionsAffected if Chat2DB is accessible remotely (network-exposed), as the CVE describes a remote attack vector
A user is affected if Chat2DB is installed with a vulnerable version where the JDBC DataSourceController handles unsanitized database connection input and is exposed for remote access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL construction with parameterized queries/prepared statements in the DataSourceController.java JDBC handling code, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9148 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9148 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data