CVE-2025-9156
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Sports Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /Admin/sports.php. Performing manipulation of the argument code results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Sports Management System 1.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the 'code' parameter in /Admin/sports.php.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the applicationCheck if your web server hosts the Sports Management System by looking for files named 'sports.php' or the application title on the login pageAffected if The application is Angeljudesuarez Sports Management System
-
Verify the versionCheck your installed files for version information, typically in a README, about page, or version constant in PHP source filesAffected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Locate the vulnerable fileCheck if the file /Admin/sports.php exists in your web application directoryAffected if The file /Admin/sports.php exists and is accessible via the web server
-
Inspect the code parameter handlingOpen /Admin/sports.php and search for usage of the 'code' parameter - look for direct insertion into SQL queries without prepared statements or escaping functionsAffected if The 'code' parameter is used in a SQL query without parameterized queries or input sanitization
-
Test for SQL injection (optional)Send a crafted request to /Admin/sports.php with a 'code' parameter value containing SQL syntax (e.g., code=' OR '1'='1 to observe different database behaviorAffected if The application responds differently based on SQL syntax in the code parameter, indicating unsanitized input handling
Your environment is affected if you run Angeljudesuarez Sports Management System version 1.0 with the /Admin/sports.php file accessible and the code parameter handled without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in sports.php to properly sanitize the 'code' parameter input, and restrict database account privileges to minimize impact if exploitation occurs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9156 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9156 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data