CVE-2025-9198
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Wp cycle text announcement plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'cycle-text' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 8.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Wp cycle text announcement WordPress plugin (versions up to 8.1) contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the 'cycle-text' shortcode. Attackers with Contributor-level access or higher can inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized user parameters due to insufficient input escaping and missing prepared statements in the existing SQL queries, enabling database data extraction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'Wp cycle text announcement' or 'Cycle Text Announcement' in the installed plugins listAffected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check the installed plugin versionClick on the plugin name in the Plugins page to view its details, or inspect the main plugin file (typically wp-content/plugins/cycle-text-announcement/cycle-text-announcement.php) and look for the Version header in the plugin comment blockAffected if The version number displayed is 8.1 or lower
-
Confirm Contributor-level or higher user accounts existGo to WordPress admin > Users and review the roles assigned to each user accountAffected if At least one user account has a role of Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator
-
Check if the cycle-text shortcode is accessibleAttempt to use the shortcode [cycle-text] in a post/page, or check if the shortcode is registered by viewing the plugin source code for add_shortcode('cycle-text', ...)Affected if The shortcode is registered and can be used by Contributor-level users
You are affected if the plugin is installed with version 8.1 or lower AND at least one user with Contributor-level or higher access can use the cycle-text shortcode.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to the latest version beyond 8.1 once available; until then, restrict the 'cycle-text' shortcode usage to Administrator-level users or deactivate the plugin to prevent exploitation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9198 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data