Ruoyi GoApplication · Lostvip

CVE-2025-9412

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was detected in lostvip-com ruoyi-go up to 2.1. This affects the function SelectListByPage of the file modules/system/dao/DictDataDao.go. The manipulation of the argument orderByColumn/isAsc results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in ruoyi-go up to v2.1 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL via the orderByColumn and isAsc parameters in the SelectListByPage function within DictDataDao.go. The application directly concatenates user-controlled input into SQL queries without proper parameterization or input validation.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for ORDER BY clauses, or validate orderByColumn against an allowlist of permitted column names, and strictly validate isAsc to only accept 'ASC' or 'DESC' values.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ruoyi GoApplication
Affected:<= 2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the ruoyi-go version in use
    Check your application's version file, build artifacts, or go.mod for the ruoyi-go dependency version (such as in a go.mod file or vendor directory)
    Affected if The version is 2.1 or any version lower than 2.1 (for example, 2.0, 1.x)
  2. Locate DictDataDao.go in the codebase
    Search for the file DictDataDao.go in your project source code, typically found under a dao or repository directory
    Affected if The file exists and contains the SelectListByPage function with SQL query logic
  3. Inspect SelectListByPage for direct SQL concatenation
    Open DictDataDao.go and locate the SelectListByPage function. Examine how the orderByColumn and isAsc parameters are used in the SQL query string
    Affected if The code directly concatenates orderByColumn or isAsc into the SQL string without using parameterized queries or strict allowlist validation
  4. Check if user input reaches the vulnerable function
    Trace the code flow from HTTP handlers/controllers to the DictDataDao.SelectListByPage call to confirm that orderByColumn and isAsc are received from user requests (such as query parameters)
    Affected if The function accepts these parameters from untrusted user input (HTTP request parameters)
  5. Verify lack of input validation on orderByColumn and isAsc
    Search for any validation logic that restricts orderByColumn to an allowlist of permitted column names, or that restricts isAsc to only 'ASC' or 'DESC' values
    Affected if No such validation exists, or the validation can be bypassed

You are affected if you are running Lostvip Ruoyi Go version 2.1 or lower and your application exposes the DictDataDao.SelectListByPage functionality with user-controlled orderByColumn or isAsc parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.1
Interim mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for ORDER BY clauses, or validate orderByColumn against an allowlist of permitted column names, and strictly validate isAsc to only accept 'ASC' or 'DESC' values.

Fix this in Ruoyi Go Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9412 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9412 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data