CVE-2025-9441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe iATS Online Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the ‘order' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.2 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe iATS Online Forms WordPress plugin has a time-based SQL Injection vulnerability in the 'order' parameter through version 1.2. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input sanitization combined with the absence of prepared SQL statements, allowing authenticated users with Contributor-level access or higher to inject malicious SQL queries via the unsanitized parameter.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm iATS Online Forms plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and look for 'iATS Online Forms' in the list. Alternatively, check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'iats-online-forms' or similar.Affected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Identify the installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin_plugins page, click on the plugin name to view details, or open the main plugin file (usually index.php or main PHP file in the plugin folder) and look for the version comment/header.Affected if The installed version is 1.2 or lower (including unversioned installations)
-
Verify the order parameter is processedExamine the plugin code for handling of the 'order' parameter. Look for files that process $_GET or $_REQUEST['order'] and construct SQL queries without using $wpdb->prepare(). Search the plugin folder for SQL query patterns like 'ORDER BY' concatenated with request parameters.Affected if The plugin processes an 'order' parameter from user input and uses it in SQL queries without prepared statements
-
Confirm user role access to vulnerable functionalityIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review which users have roles of Contributor or higher. Check if the iATS Online Forms plugin exposes any public-facing forms that accept the 'order' parameter without authentication.Affected if Any user with Contributor role or higher exists, or the vulnerable parameter is accessible to unauthenticated users (if the plugin exposes such endpoints)
If the iATS Online Forms plugin version is 1.2 or lower and processes the 'order' parameter in SQL queries without prepared statements, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest version of the iATS Online Forms plugin; if no update is available, implement proper input validation and replace dynamic SQL with $wpdb->prepare() using parameterized queries.
Any version newer than 1.2 (check WordPress plugin repository for latest release)
- Check the current version of the iATS Online Forms plugin installed on your WordPress site
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- If the installed version is 1.2 or below, update the plugin to the latest available version from the WordPress plugin repository
- After updating, verify the plugin is working correctly on your site
- Ensure any users with Contributor-level or higher access are trusted, as this vulnerability requires authentication to exploit
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data