CVE-2025-9444
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in 1000projects Online Project Report Submission and Evaluation System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/controller/delete_group_student.php. The manipulation of the argument batch_id leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the batch_id parameter of /admin/controller/delete_group_student.php in the 1000projects Online Project Report Submission and Evaluation System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries, potentially enabling data exfiltration, unauthorized administrative access, or complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the installed product versionLocate and inspect the version file or header in the 1000projects system (commonly in version.php, about.php, or the main index page). Compare the version number to 1.0.Affected if The system is running version 1.0 of the 1000projects Online Project Report Submission and Evaluation System.
-
Confirm the vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /admin/controller/delete_group_student.php exists in the web root directory of the application.Affected if The file delete_group_student.php is present in the /admin/controller/ directory.
-
Check admin panel accessibilityAttempt to access the /admin/ directory or the vulnerable script directly without authentication to determine if authentication is enforced.Affected if The admin panel or the delete_group_student.php script is accessible without valid authentication.
-
Inspect the batch_id parameter handlingExamine the source code of delete_group_student.php and look for SQL queries that directly incorporate the batch_id parameter without using prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The batch_id parameter is used directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries, prepared statements, or input sanitization.
-
Test for SQL injection vulnerabilitySend a crafted request to /admin/controller/delete_group_student.php with a malicious payload in the batch_id parameter (e.g., batch_id=1' OR '1'='1) and observe the database response or error messages.Affected if The application returns database errors, unexpected data, or exhibits behavior indicating unsanitized input is being executed as SQL.
A user is affected if they are running version 1.0 of the 1000projects Online Project Report Submission and Evaluation System with the vulnerable delete_group_student.php file accessible and the batch_id parameter handled without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements and implement strict input validation on the batch_id parameter. Restrict admin panel access to authenticated, authorized users and apply the principle of least privilege.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation5.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9444 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data