CVE-2025-9452
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability exists in certain Autodesk products when parsing maliciously crafted SLDPRT (SolidWorks part) files. The vulnerability allows arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process due to improper memory handling during file parsing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Autodesk products that handle SLDPRT filesCheck installed programs for Autodesk applications such as AutoCAD, DesignReview, or other products that commonly open SLDPRT files. Use 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion' or review Programs and Features.Affected if Any Autodesk product that opens SLDPRT files is installed
-
Determine Autodesk Shared Components versionLocate and check the version of Autodesk Shared Components (ACCoreComponents, ACForceCore, or similar runtime components). Look in the application's installation directory or check assembly version info. Common locations include Program Files\Autodesk or within the specific product's folder.Affected if Shared Components version is displayed as anything less than 2026.5 or the version cannot be determined as 2026.5 or higher
-
Verify SLDPRT file association existsCheck if .sldPRT file extension is associated with any installed Autodesk application. Use 'assoc .sldPRT' or check registry under HKCR\.sldPRT to see the associated handler.Affected if SLDPRT files are associated with an installed Autodesk application
-
Confirm file preview or thumbnail handler is enabledCheck if Windows thumbnail preview or file preview handler is enabled for SLDPRT files. Inspect registry under HKCR\.sldPRT\ShellEx\{ThumbnailHandler...} or check if preview pane in Windows Explorer loads thumbnails for these files.Affected if Preview features for SLDPRT files are enabled in the Windows shell
You are affected if an installed Autodesk product uses Shared Components version below 2026.5 and the system can open or preview SLDPRT files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.5
Apply available vendor patches for affected Autodesk products. Until patches are available, exercise caution when opening SLDPRT files from untrusted sources and consider disabling file preview features.
2026.5 or later
- Identify all Autodesk products installed that utilize the Shared Components (this includes design and CAD applications that process SLDPRT files)
- Check the current version of each installed Autodesk product
- Download Autodesk product updates from the official Autodesk website (www.autodesk.com) or through your organization's software distribution system
- Upgrade all affected Autodesk products to version 2026.5 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the product version number
- After upgrading, do not open untrusted or unexpected SLDPRT files in any Autodesk product
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9452 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9452 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data