CVE-2025-9485
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe OAuth Single Sign On – SSO (OAuth Client) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in versions up to, and including, 6.26.12. This is due to the plugin performing unsafe JWT token processing without verification or validation in the `get_resource_owner_from_id_token` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication and gain access to any existing user account - including administrators in certain configurations - or to create arbitrary subscriber-level accounts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe OAuth SSO WordPress plugin fails to verify or validate JWT cryptographic signatures in the get_resource_owner_from_id_token function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge tokens and bypass authentication to access existing user accounts (including admins in certain configurations) or create arbitrary subscriber accounts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the OAuth SSO plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and look for 'OAuth Single Sign On - SSO' or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for folders containing 'oauth-sso' or similar OAuth-related plugin namesAffected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Determine the installed plugin versionIn WordPress Admin > Plugins, click on the plugin name to view details, or inspect the plugin's main PHP file header for 'Version:' tag, or check /wp-content/plugins/oauth-sso/readme.txt for the stable tagAffected if Version is lower than 6.26.13 (vulnerable) or version cannot be determined
-
Verify if OAuth/OIDC authentication is configured and activeCheck WordPress Admin > Settings > OAuth SSO settings page, look for configured Identity Providers (IdPs), enabled OAuth/SSO login options, and note which user roles can authenticate via SSOAffected if OAuth/OIDC authentication is enabled and connected to an Identity Provider, making the vulnerable function get_resource_owner_from_id_token actively used during login attempts
-
Audit user accounts for unauthorized creationsIn WordPress Admin > Users, review all accounts created around the time the vulnerability became public (or recently), especially accounts with Subscriber role or administrative roles you did not create. Check user registration date and email addresses.Affected if Unexpected user accounts exist, particularly Subscriber accounts or admin accounts you did not create
-
Review authentication logs for suspicious activityCheck WordPress debug.log, server access logs, and any SSO plugin logs for repeated login attempts with invalid or malformed tokens, successful logins from unknown IP addresses, or authentication failures to the get_resource_owner_from_id_token functionAffected if Logs show authentication anomalies such as forged token usage, successful logins without proper IdP authentication, or multiple failed signature validation attempts
You are affected if the OAuth Single Sign On plugin is installed with a version lower than 6.26.13 and OAuth/OIDC authentication is enabled, regardless of whether you have confirmed unauthorized account access yet.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the OAuth Single Sign On – SSO plugin to version 6.26.13 or later which implements proper JWT signature verification. Audit user accounts for unauthorized access.
Latest version greater than 6.26.12 (contact vendor for exact fixed release)
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate the 'OAuth Single Sign On – SSO (OAuth Client)' plugin
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to the latest version
- 5. After updating, verify the new version number is greater than 6.26.12
- 6. Test the OAuth login functionality to ensure the plugin continues to work correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9485 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9485 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data