CVE-2025-9571
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Google Cloud Data Fusion. A user with permissions to upload artifacts to a Data Fusion instance can execute arbitrary code within the core AppFabric component. This could allow the attacker to gain control over the Data Fusion instance, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of data pipelines, and exploration of the underlying infrastructure. The following CDAP versions include the necessary update to protect against this vulnerability: * 6.10.6+ * 6.11.1+ Users must immediately upgrade to them, or greater ones, available at: https://github.com/cdapio/cdap-build/releases .
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA remote code execution vulnerability in Google Cloud Data Fusion allows a user with artifact upload permissions to execute arbitrary code within the core AppFabric component, granting full control over the instance and access to underlying infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Red
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the CDAP versionCheck the Data Fusion instance version through the Google Cloud Console or via the CDAP API/CLI toolsAffected if The installed version is earlier than 6.10.6 or 6.11.1, or cannot be determined to be at or above these versions
-
Verify user has artifact upload permissionsReview IAM roles and permissions assigned to users in the Data Fusion instance. Specifically check for roles that include artifact upload or pipeline deployment capabilitiesAffected if Users with artifact upload permissions exist in the environment
-
Confirm AppFabric component is accessibleCheck if the AppFabric REST API endpoints are reachable from the network where potential attackers would operateAffected if AppFabric component is exposed and accessible without additional authentication beyond basic IAM
-
Check for custom artifact deployment activityReview Data Fusion audit logs or deployment history for any custom artifact or plugin uploadsAffected if Custom artifacts have been uploaded to the instance, indicating the vulnerable feature is in use
-
Assess instance network exposureDetermine whether the Data Fusion UI and API are accessible from the public internet or only from trusted internal networksAffected if The instance is internet-facing and allows authenticated access to users who may have artifact upload permissions
The environment is affected if the CDAP version is earlier than 6.10.6 or 6.11.1 AND users with artifact upload permissions exist with access to the Data Fusion instance.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade CDAP to version 6.10.6+ or 6.11.1+ (or later) as specified in the official GitHub releases.
CDAP 6.10.6+ or 6.11.1+ (any later version)
- Identify the current CDAP version running your Google Cloud Data Fusion instance
- Navigate to https://github.com/cdapio/cdap-build/releases to download the fixed version
- Select CDAP version 6.10.6 or higher, OR version 6.11.1 or higher (both contain the security fix)
- Review the release notes for any migration or pre-upgrade requirements
- Plan a maintenance window following Google Cloud Data Fusion upgrade procedures
- Execute the upgrade following the official Google Cloud Data Fusion upgrade documentation
- Verify the upgrade was successful and confirm the vulnerability is patched
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9571 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9571 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data