CVE-2025-9596
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Sports Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /login.php. This manipulation of the argument User causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Sports Management System 1.0's /login.php script through the User parameter allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially achieving unauthenticated database access or remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application identityInspect the web application's title, footer, or source files to identify if it is itsourcecode Sports Management System or Angeljudesuarez Sports Management SystemAffected if The application is either system from itsourcecode or Angeljudesuarez
-
Verify the installed versionCheck version information in the application (typically in an about page, configuration file, or footer) and confirm it is exactly version 1.0Affected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Locate the login scriptCheck if the file /login.php exists in the web root directoryAffected if The file /login.php exists and is accessible
-
Identify User parameter handling in login.phpOpen login.php and search for the User parameter handling code. Look for SQL queries that incorporate the User input directly (e.g., 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ' + $_POST['user'])Affected if The User parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterized statements or input sanitization
-
Check database configuration exposureExamine if the database user configured for the application has elevated privileges (like FILE privileges or administrative rights) that could enable data exfiltration or OS-level accessAffected if The application database user has privileges beyond basic SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
You are affected if you are running itsourcecode or Angeljudesuarez Sports Management System version 1.0 with the /login.php script handling the User parameter through unparameterized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in login.php and all other user input handling scripts to neutralize SQL injection vectors.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9596 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9596 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data