CVE-2025-9597
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Apartment Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /o_dashboard/rented_all_info.php. Such manipulation of the argument uid leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the uid parameter of /o_dashboard/rented_all_info.php in itsourcecode Apartment Management System 1.0. Attackers can inject malicious SQL queries through this parameter to access, modify, or delete database contents without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm apartment management system installationSearch the web root directory for files or directories indicating itsourcecode Apartment Management System, such as the presence of 'apartment' or 'AMS' naming in application folders, login pages, or configuration files.Affected if The itsourcecode Apartment Management System is installed on the server.
-
Verify the application versionLocate and inspect version information in the application. Check the source code, README files, or configuration files for a version number. If accessible via web interface, look at the login page footer or About page.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Check for the vulnerable PHP fileLocate the web root and search for the file at path /o_dashboard/rented_all_info.php. This file should exist within the application directory structure.Affected if The file o_dashboard/rented_all_info.php exists in the application directory.
-
Verify network accessibility of vulnerable endpointConfirm the application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS and the /o_dashboard/ directory path is reachable. Attempt a HEAD or GET request to the vulnerable endpoint to confirm it responds.Affected if The endpoint /o_dashboard/rented_all_info.php is accessible without authentication.
A system is affected if the itsourcecode Apartment Management System version 1.0 is installed with the file o_dashboard/rented_all_info.php present and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations and add input validation on the uid parameter. Conduct a full code audit to identify and remediate similar SQL injection vulnerabilities across the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9597 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9597 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data