CVE-2025-9751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in Campcodes Online Learning Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /login.php. This manipulation of the argument Username causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Online Learning Management System 1.0's /login.php script. The Username parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code. This could enable authentication bypass, data exfiltration, or potential remote code execution depending on the database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application is installedLocate the file /login.php in the web root directory. Check if the path /login.php exists and contains the Campcodes Online Learning Management System login form.Affected if The login.php file exists and is accessible via the web server.
-
Verify the installed version is 1.0Check the application version by inspecting the source code, version file, or any version metadata in the application root. Compare against '1.0'.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Check if the application is network accessibleDetermine if the login.php page is reachable over HTTP/HTTPS from a remote location. Attempt to access the login endpoint.Affected if The login.php page responds to HTTP/HTTPS requests.
-
Inspect the login.php code for the Username parameter handlingReview the login.php source code and locate the database query that processes the Username parameter. Look for direct string concatenation or lack of prepared statements in the SQL query.Affected if The Username parameter is used in a SQL query without parameterized queries or input sanitization.
A user is affected if they have Campcodes Online Learning Management System version 1.0 running with the login.php page accessible over the network and the Username parameter processed without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all SQL queries, particularly in the login authentication logic. Additionally, apply input validation and consider deploying a WAF rule as a temporary protective measure until the code fix is fully deployed.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data