Remote ClinicApplication · Remoteclinic

CVE-2025-9772

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-01
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was detected in RemoteClinic up to 2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /staff/edit.php. Performing manipulation of the argument image results in unrestricted upload. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

RemoteClinic versions up to 2.0 contain an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in /staff/edit.php where the 'image' parameter is not properly validated, allowing remote attackers to upload arbitrary files including malicious executables. The CVSS 9.8 indicates the exploit requires no authentication and can be triggered remotely.

MitigationSince RemoteClinic is no longer supported, no vendor patch is available. Organizations should disable the affected upload functionality or migrate to a supported alternative. If continued use is required, implement proper file validation (extension allowlist, MIME type checking, file content inspection) in /staff/edit.php or deploy a WAF to block malicious uploads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Remote ClinicApplication
Affected:<= 2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify RemoteClinic is installed
    Identify if the RemoteClinic application exists in your environment by checking for its web files, typically found in the web root directory where the application is hosted.
    Affected if RemoteClinic is present in the environment and has not been removed or replaced.
  2. Confirm installed version
    Locate and read the version file or metadata within the RemoteClinic installation directory to determine the exact version number.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.0 or any earlier version, since the vulnerability affects versions up to and including 2.0.
  3. Locate the vulnerable script
    Verify that the file /staff/edit.php exists within the RemoteClinic web directory structure.
    Affected if The file /staff/edit.php is present and accessible via the web server.
  4. Check if upload functionality is exposed
    Examine whether the 'image' parameter can be submitted to /staff/edit.php through HTTP POST requests, indicating the upload feature is enabled and accessible.
    Affected if The 'image' parameter upload functionality in /staff/edit.php is accessible without authentication.
  5. Assess file validation controls
    Inspect the server-side code in /staff/edit.php to determine if the 'image' parameter performs proper validation on uploaded files, such as extension allowlisting, MIME type checking, or file content inspection.
    Affected if No server-side validation or inadequate validation (missing extension allowlist, no MIME type check, no content verification) is performed on the uploaded file.

Your environment is affected if RemoteClinic version 2.0 or earlier is installed, the /staff/edit.php file exists, and it lacks proper server-side validation on the 'image' parameter for uploaded files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.0
Interim mitigation

Since RemoteClinic is no longer supported, no vendor patch is available. Organizations should disable the affected upload functionality or migrate to a supported alternative. If continued use is required, implement proper file validation (extension allowlist, MIME type checking, file content inspection) in /staff/edit.php or deploy a WAF to block malicious uploads.

Fix this in Remote Clinic Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9772 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9772 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data