CVE-2025-9814
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System 1.1. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /admin/contact-us.php. The manipulation of the argument mobnumber results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System 1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the mobnumber parameter in /admin/contact-us.php. The lack of parameterized queries or proper input sanitization enables complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Beauty Parlour Management System is installedLocate the application webroot directory. Look for typical PHP application files like index.php, and check for 'PHPGurukul' or 'Beauty Parlour' branding in source code or page titles.Affected if The application is present on the server and appears to be the PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System.
-
Confirm the exact version numberCheck for a version indicator in source code comments, a version.php file, or any README/install files within the application directory.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.1.
-
Locate the vulnerable contact-us.php fileNavigate to the /admin/ directory within the webroot and verify that contact-us.php exists.Affected if The file /admin/contact-us.php is present in the application.
-
Inspect the contact-us.php code for the mobnumber parameter handlerOpen /admin/contact-us.php and search for the mobnumber parameter. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate this parameter without using prepared statements or parameterized queries.Affected if The code contains SQL queries that directly use the mobnumber parameter without sanitization or prepared statements.
If the system is PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System version 1.1 with the /admin/contact-us.php file present and using unsanitized mobnumber in SQL queries, it is vulnerable to CVE-2025-9814.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries in contact-us.php, or implement strict input validation with whitelisting for the mobnumber field. Apply emergency WAF rules as temporary mitigation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9814 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9814 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data