CVE-2025-9842
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in Das Parking Management System 停车场管理系统 6.2.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /Operator/Search. The manipulation results in information disclosure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDas Parking Management System 6.2.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /Operator/Search endpoint. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access sensitive information through manipulation of this endpoint. A public exploit is available, making immediate remediation critical.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Das Parking Management System versionCheck the application's version information, typically found in the admin panel, about page, or in version files within the installation directory. Look for a file like version.php, or check the HTTP response headers/server banners if exposed.Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.2.0
-
Verify /Operator/Search endpoint exists and is reachableSend a GET or POST request to http(s)://[target]/Operator/Search using curl or a web browser. Note that this endpoint should not be accessible without authentication in a patched system.Affected if The endpoint responds with HTTP 200 or other successful status codes rather than redirecting to a login page or returning 401/403
-
Confirm endpoint accepts unauthenticated requestsSend a request to /Operator/Search without providing any authentication tokens, session cookies, or login credentials. Observe whether the response contains sensitive parking data (vehicle records, owner information, payment details) or returns an error requiring login.Affected if The endpoint returns sensitive information (vehicle plates, customer names, payment records, operator data) without any authentication challenge
If the installed version is exactly 6.2.0 AND the /Operator/Search endpoint is accessible without authentication and returns sensitive data, the environment is affected by CVE-2025-9842.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict access to the /Operator/Search endpoint by implementing proper authentication and authorization controls. Validate all user inputs and ensure the endpoint only returns data that the authenticated user is permitted to access.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9842 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9842 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data