Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2025-9902

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in AKIN Software Computer Import Export Industry and Trade Co. Ltd. QRMenu allows Privilege Abuse. This issue affects QRMenu: from 1.05.12 before Version dated 05.09.2025.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

AKIN Software QRMenu contains an authorization bypass vulnerability where user-controlled keys can be manipulated to bypass authentication and authorization checks, leading to privilege abuse. An attacker could potentially access resources or functionality beyond their authorized privileges by manipulating these user-controlled parameters.

MitigationImplement proper server-side authorization validation for all user-controlled keys and parameters. Ensure authorization checks cannot be bypassed through direct object reference or parameter manipulation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm AKIN Software QRMenu is installed
    Search for QRMenu application files, check web server directories, or review installed software lists for 'QRMenu' or 'AKIN Software' entries
    Affected if The product AKIN Software QRMenu is present in the environment
  2. Identify QRMenu version
    Check application files for version information in configuration files, about pages, or metadata; compare against any available version records
    Affected if Installed version falls within an affected release range (if such range becomes known)
  3. Review user-controlled parameter handling
    Inspect application code or proxy traffic to identify endpoints that accept user-controlled keys, tokens, or identifiers used in authorization decisions
    Affected if Application uses user-supplied keys or parameters directly in authorization logic without server-side validation
  4. Test for authorization bypass via parameter manipulation
    If you have access to the application, attempt to modify user-controlled parameters (such as IDs, tokens, or keys) in requests to access resources outside your privilege level
    Affected if Modifying user-controlled parameters allows access to functionality or data beyond the current user's authorized scope
  5. Check for direct object reference vulnerabilities
    Review API endpoints or application URLs for exposed internal identifiers (user IDs, record IDs, keys) that could be manipulated to access other users' resources
    Affected if Application exposes direct object references that can be manipulated to bypass authorization checks

Your environment is affected if AKIN Software QRMenu is installed and uses user-controlled keys or parameters in authorization logic without proper server-side validation, allowing privilege escalation through parameter manipulation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper server-side authorization validation for all user-controlled keys and parameters. Ensure authorization checks cannot be bypassed through direct object reference or parameter manipulation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9902 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9902 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data