CVE-2025-9919
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in 1000projects Beauty Parlour Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php. The manipulation of the argument fromdate/todate leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in 1000projects Beauty Parlour Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code via the fromdate and todate parameters in the /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php file. The attack requires no authentication as it targets the admin panel's date reporting functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Beauty Parlour Management System installationLocate the application directory (commonly in web root like /var/www/html or C:\inetpub\wwwroot). Check for files indicating this specific application, such as index.php with 'Beauty Parlour Management System' branding, or check version files if present.Affected if The application directory contains Beauty Parlour Management System files and version is 1.0
-
Verify vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php exists in the web application directory. This file handles date-based reporting functionality.Affected if The file bwdates-reports-details.php exists in the /admin directory
-
Check admin panel accessibilityAttempt to access the /admin/ directory or the vulnerable file directly via HTTP request. Since this requires no authentication, the endpoint should be reachable without login credentials.Affected if The admin panel or bwdates-reports-details.php is accessible without authentication
-
Inspect application logs for SQL injection attemptsReview web server access logs (Apache access.log, Nginx access.log) and application logs for requests to /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php containing SQL syntax in fromdate or todate parameters (such as quotes, UNION, OR 1=1, or sleep() functions).Affected if Log entries show SQL injection patterns in fromdate or todate parameters to the vulnerable file
-
Test parameter vulnerability (if safe to do)Send a benign test request to /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php with fromdate=2025-01-01' and todate=2025-01-31 to observe if SQL syntax errors are returned, indicating unsanitized input handling.Affected if The application returns SQL syntax errors or unexpected database responses when special characters are passed in date parameters
A system is affected if it runs Beauty Parlour Management System version 1.0 with the bwdates-reports-details.php file accessible and the fromdate/todate parameters accepting unsanitized SQL input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in bwdates-reports-details.php for the fromdate and todate parameters. Conduct a broader code review to identify and remediate similar SQL injection vulnerabilities across the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9919 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9919 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data