CVE-2025-9943
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn SQL injection vulnerability has been identified in the "ID" attribute of the SAML response when the replay cache of the Shibboleth Service Provider (SP) is configured to use an SQL database as storage service. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue via blind SQL injection, allowing for the extraction of arbitrary data from the database, if the database connection is configured to use the ODBC plugin. The vulnerability arises from insufficient escaping of single quotes in the class SQLString (file odbc-store.cpp, lines 253-271). This issue affects Shibboleth Service Provider through 3.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the SAML replay cache of Shibboleth SP when using ODBC database storage. The vulnerability stems from insufficient escaping of single quotes in the SQLString class (odbc-store.cpp lines 253-271), allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL through the 'ID' attribute of SAML responses.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Shibboleth SP versionRun 'shibd -v' or check the installed package version via your system's package manager (e.g., rpm -q shibboleth, dpkg -l shibboleth, or yum list shibboleth)Affected if The installed version is 3.5.0 or earlier (any version up to and including 3.5.0)
-
Locate the SAML replay cache configurationSearch the Shibboleth SP configuration file (commonly shibboleth2.xml or similar) for '<ReplayCache>' or 'ReplayCache' elementsAffected if A <ReplayCache> element exists and specifies ODBC storage (look for 'odbc' or ODBC-related data source references)
-
Verify ODBC is the active replay cache storage backendIn theReplayCache configuration, check the 'type' or data source definition - look for ODBC connection strings, ODBC provider classes, or references to odbc-store in the configurationAffected if The replay cache storage is explicitly configured to use ODBC (e.g., type='ODBC', connection strings with 'Driver=', or similar ODBC data source configuration)
-
Confirm the vulnerability path existsVerify that SAML responses with an 'ID' attribute are being processed by the ODBC-based replay cache - this is implicit if steps 1-3 confirm a vulnerable version with ODBC replay cache enabledAffected if Shibboleth SP version is 3.5.0 or earlier AND ODBC-based replay cache is configured and active
You are affected if running Shibboleth SP version 3.5.0 or earlier with the SAML replay cache configured to use ODBC database storage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Shibboleth SP beyond version 3.5.0 or apply the vendor patch to properly escape single quotes in the ODBC SQLString class. If immediate patching is unavailable, disable ODBC-based replay cache storage and use an alternative storage backend.
Latest Shibboleth SP release (check shibboleth.net for 3.5.1 or subsequent security release)
- 1. Identify the current Shibboleth SP version installed using package manager or binary version check
- 2. Review the replay cache configuration in shibboleth2.xml to confirm if ODBC database storage is in use
- 3. If ODBC is configured, immediately consider disabling the replay cache or switching to an alternative storage backend as a temporary mitigation
- 4. Check Shibboleth project's official security advisories at shibboleth.net for the fixed release version
- 5. Upgrade Shibboleth SP to the latest stable release that addresses CVE-2025-9943
- 6. After upgrade, verify the odbc-store.cpp file contains the corrected SQLString escaping logic
- 7. Test the SAML response processing to ensure normal functionality
- 8. Monitor logs for any SQL injection attempts targeting the ID attribute
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9943 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9943 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data