CVE-2025-9977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedValue provided in one of POST parameters sent during the process of logging in to Times Software E-Payroll is not sanitized properly, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform DoS attacks. SQL injection attacks might also be feasible, although so far creating a working exploit has been prevented probably by backend filtering mechanisms. Additionally, command injection attempts cause the application to return extensive error messages disclosing some information about the internal infrastructure. Patching status is unknown because the vendor has not replied to messages sent by the CNA.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceTimes Software E-Payroll has unsanitized POST parameters in its login process, enabling unauthenticated attackers to cause denial of service. While SQL injection may be blocked by backend filters, the lack of input sanitization combined with verbose error messages on command injection attempts creates information disclosure risks about the internal infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Times Software E-Payroll installationSearch for Times Software E-Payroll application files in web server document roots or application directories. Common paths may include /var/www/, /inetpub/, or application-specific directories. Look for files named 'login', 'epayroll', or Times Software branding.Affected if The application is present on the system
-
Identify the installed versionLocate version information in the application. Check for version.txt, About pages within the E-Payroll web interface, or configuration files that may contain version strings. Compare against any publicly documented version numbers for this product.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is earlier than any patched version
-
Verify login endpoint accessibilityAccess the login page via HTTP/HTTPS. Confirm the login form processes POST requests to the authentication endpoint. Note the URL path used for credential submission.Affected if The login form is accessible without authentication and accepts POST parameters
-
Inspect error message configurationExamine application configuration files and application server settings for error handling. Check if custom error pages are configured or if the application returns detailed stack traces and system information in error responses.Affected if Verbose error messages, stack traces, or infrastructure details are returned to unauthenticated users
-
Test for input validation in login parametersSubmit a benign test payload (such as a simple string with special characters) to the login POST parameters. Observe whether the application returns detailed error messages, executes any injected input, or crashes causing denial of service.Affected if The application reflects submitted input in error messages, throws unhandled exceptions, or becomes unresponsive
A user is affected if Times Software E-Payroll is installed with an accessible login form that returns verbose error messages without sanitizing POST parameter input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince no vendor patch is available, implement compensating controls such as Web Application Firewall rules to filter malicious input, rate limiting to mitigate DoS, and configure application servers to return generic error messages instead of detailed stack traces.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data