CVE-2025-9996
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability exists that could cause the execution of any shell command when executing a netstat command using BLMon Console in an SSH session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in BLMon Console allows execution of arbitrary shell commands through improper sanitization of input when executing a netstat command within an SSH session. User-supplied data is passed directly to the shell without neutralization of special shell metacharacters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BLMon Console installationSearch for BLMon Console binaries, services, or installation directories on the system. Common locations may include /opt/blmon, /usr/local/blmon, or check system services for blmon-related processes.Affected if BLMon Console is found running on the system
-
Determine installed BLMon Console versionRun version detection commands such as 'blmon --version', 'blmon -v', or check installed package information if installed via a package manager. Compare against any available version documentation.Affected if The installed version is within the affected product range or version cannot be determined (treat as potentially affected)
-
Verify SSH access is enabledCheck if SSH service is running and if BLMon Console has SSH-related configurations. Look for SSH configuration files in BLMon directories or check if SSH authentication methods are configured for BLMon.Affected if SSH access is enabled and BLMon Console is accessible via SSH sessions
-
Confirm netstat command functionality existsWithin BLMon Console's SSH session interface, attempt to locate or access the netstat command functionality. Check if netstat can be invoked through BLMon's command interface or help menus.Affected if The netstat command functionality is available within the BLMon Console SSH session
-
Inspect input handling for command injection vectorsIf netstat is accessible, test the input fields used for netstat arguments. Observe if special shell characters (; | & $ ` etc.) are processed by a shell interpreter or passed directly to the command.Affected if User-supplied input to netstat is passed to a shell interpreter without sanitization
A user is affected if BLMon Console is installed with SSH access enabled and the netstat command within SSH sessions accepts unsanitized user input that gets interpreted by a shell.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and use parameterized command execution or secure APIs that avoid shell interpretation of user input. Alternatively, use allowlists of permitted command arguments.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9996 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9996 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data