CVE-2026-0035
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn createRequest of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way for an app to gain read/write access to non-existing files due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic error in the createRequest method of MediaProvider.java allows a malicious application to gain read/write access to non-existent files. This local privilege escalation vulnerability requires no additional execution privileges or user interaction to exploit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.0= 15.0= 16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADBAffected if The installed version is 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 - these versions contain the logic error in MediaProvider.java's createRequest method
-
Verify MediaProvider service statusRun 'dumpsys media.provider' via ADB shell to confirm MediaProvider is active and note its current configurationAffected if MediaProvider is actively running and serving requests - the logic error affects how it grants permissions to non-existing files during request creation
-
Audit installed apps for suspicious file access behaviorUse 'dumpsys activity service MediaProvider' via ADB to observe which apps are interacting with MediaProvider, or review security logs for apps attempting to create/modify files in restricted directoriesAffected if A malicious app is leveraging MediaProvider to gain read/write permissions on non-existing files without user interaction - look for unusual file creation patterns in sandboxed directories
-
Review app permission grantsCheck which apps have 'android.permission.READ_MEDIA_IMAGES', 'android.permission.READ_MEDIA_VIDEO', or similar media permissions via 'dumpsys package' via ADBAffected if Apps with elevated media permissions are present and could potentially exploit the privilege escalation - the flaw allows a malicious app to bypass normal permission checks
If the device runs Android 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 and has apps that interact with MediaProvider for file access, the environment is potentially affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch to MediaProvider.java that corrects the file existence validation logic in the createRequest method to deny access to non-existing files.
Latest Android security patch level (check Android Security Bulletin for specific release containing the fix)
- 1. Check your device's current Android version and security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Android version
- 2. Check for system updates in Settings > System > Software Update or Settings > About Phone > Software Update
- 3. Apply the latest available Android security update, which will include the fix for this vulnerability in MediaProvider
- 4. Verify the security patch level has been updated after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0035 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0035 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data