AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2026-0039

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in multiple functions within the UBSan (Undefined Behavior Sanitizer) runtime library file ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp. This compiler runtime component, used during development for detecting undefined behavior, contains integer overflow conditions that can cause a persistent denial of service when instrumented applications encounter the overflow during runtime checks. No user interaction or elevated privileges are required for exploitation.

MitigationUpdate the LLVM/Clang toolchain to the latest version containing the patch for this vulnerability, or remove UBSan instrumentation from production builds if toolchain update is not feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 14.0= 15.0= 16.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Android OS version
    Run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android version
    Affected if The device runs Android 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 specifically (exact version match)
  2. Identify if UBSan is linked in the target binary
    Use 'objdump -p BINARY | grep -i ubsan' or check for strings like 'ubsan' in the binary, or examine the .dynamic section for UBSan runtime library references
    Affected if The binary links against libubsan.so or contains UBSan runtime instrumentation
  3. Check for UBSan runtime library presence on the system
    Search for libubsan.so on the device: 'find / -name "libubsan*" 2>/dev/null' or check /system/lib64/ and /system/lib/
    Affected if The libubsan.so library is present on the system and gets loaded by any process
  4. Inspect build configuration for sanitizer flags
    Review the Makefile, CMakeLists.txt, or build.gradle for flags such as -fsanitize=undefined or -fsanitize=undefined,integer and verify if UBSan is enabled in the final build
    Affected if Build configuration contains '-fsanitize=undefined' or similar UBSan flags that compile in the runtime
  5. Verify if this is a production build with sanitizer enabled
    Check whether the binary is a debug/release build with sanitizer instrumentation: 'file BINARY' and look for debug symbols, or use 'readelf -d BINARY | grep -i sanitize'
    Affected if The binary is a production release that still contains UBSan instrumentation (sanitizers should only be in debug/dev builds)

A user is affected if their Android device runs version 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 AND the target application or system binary includes UBSan runtime instrumentation (libubsan) that gets loaded into memory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the LLVM/Clang toolchain to the latest version containing the patch for this vulnerability, or remove UBSan instrumentation from production builds if toolchain update is not feasible.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0039 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0039 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data