CVE-2026-0093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn multiple locations, there is a possible misleading UI due to obfuscation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA UI obfuscation vulnerability exists in multiple locations that allows a local attacker to escalate privileges by misleading the system through deceptive user interface elements. The flaw requires no user interaction and no additional execution privileges, making it a straightforward local privilege escalation vector.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.0= 15.0= 16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android OS versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The installed version equals 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 exactly
-
Check for UI overlay permissions grantedGo to Settings > Apps > Special app access > Display over other apps, or run 'adb shell dumpsys package <package_name> | grep SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW' for specific appsAffected if Apps have SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW or android.permission.SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW permission granted, especially untrusted apps
-
Check accessibility services configurationGo to Settings > Accessibility > Installed services, or run 'adb shell dumpsys accessibility' to list active servicesAffected if Any accessibility service is enabled that could intercept or manipulate UI elements for privilege escalation
-
Review apps with window token permissionsRun 'adb shell dumpsys package' and search for packages with android.permission.INTERNAL_SYSTEM_WINDOW or similar window-related permissionsAffected if Any app holds permissions allowing creation of windows that could overlay system UI elements
-
Audit UI-related app permissionsRun 'adb shell pm list permissions -g' and inspect permissions in the 'UI' or 'Display' groupsAffected if Apps hold permissions that allow manipulation of system UI surfaces without explicit user validation
A user is affected if their Android device runs version 14.0, 15.0, or 16.0 and has any third-party apps with overlay, accessibility, or window management permissions that could be exploited through UI obfuscation techniques.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedConduct a comprehensive code audit across all identified locations to identify and remove UI obfuscation, ensuring all interface elements are properly rendered with clear, unambiguous labels and visual indicators.
Latest Android security update (security patch level containing fix for CVE-2026-0093)
- 1. Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- 2. Ensure the device receives and installs the latest Android security update
- 3. For Android 14.0 devices: Update to the latest available security patch level (typically addressing vulnerabilities in the framework)
- 4. For Android 15.0 devices: Update to the latest available security patch level
- 5. For Android 16.0 devices: Update to the latest available security patch level
- 6. If OTA updates are unavailable, check with device OEM for available firmware updates containing the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data