CVE-2026-0203
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in packet processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated, network-adjacent attacker sending a specifically malformed ICMP packet to cause an FPC to crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). When an ICMP packet is received with a specifically malformed IP header value, the FPC receiving the packet crashes and restarts. Due to the specific type of malformed packet, adjacent upstream routers would not forward the packet, limiting the attack surface to adjacent networks. This issue only affects ICMPv4. ICMPv6 is not vulnerable to this issue. This issue does not affect AFT-based line cards such as the MPC10, MPC11, LC4800, LC9600, and MX304. This issue affects Junos OS: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S10, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S7, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S4, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S5, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3, * from 24.2 before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Junos OS packet processing allows an unauthenticated, network-adjacent attacker to send a specifically malformed ICMPv4 packet with an invalid IP header value, causing the FPC (Forwarding Packet Processor) to crash and restart, resulting in denial of service. ICMPv6 and AFT-based line cards are not affected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the device to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The displayed version matches any of these: < 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2 (note: 24.2R1-S1 and earlier 24.2 versions are affected; only 24.2R1-S2 or 24.2R2 and later are fixed)
-
Confirm ICMPv4 processing is enabledVerify that the device processes ICMPv4 traffic. This is typically enabled by default. Use 'show icmp' or check firewall filter configurations that may permit ICMPv4Affected if ICMPv4 processing is active on any interface reachable from adjacent network segments
-
Identify FPC line cardsRun 'show chassis fpc' to list Forwarding Packet Cards installed in the deviceAffected if The device has one or more FPCs (non-AFT based line cards) present; AFT-based line cards are not affected according to the CVE
-
Check for recent FPC restartsRun 'show chassis fpc' and review the 'Uptime' field for any FPCs with very short uptime, or use 'show log messages' searching for FPC crash indicatorsAffected if Any FPC shows recent restarts or crash-related messages in the system logs
You are affected if the device runs any Junos OS version listed as vulnerable AND has ICMPv4 reachable FPC line cards (non-AFT based) that could process malformed ICMPv4 packets from adjacent networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the appropriate Junos OS software update (21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S7, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R1-S2/24.2R2) to all affected devices. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to adjacent networks only.
21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S10, 22.2R3-S7, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S5, 23.2R2-S3, 23.4R2-S3, or 24.2R2 (depending on current branch)
- Identify the current Junos OS version running on the device using 'show version' command
- Determine which version branch your current release belongs to (21.2.x, 21.4.x, 22.2.x, 22.3.x, 22.4.x, 23.2.x, 23.4.x, or 24.2.x)
- Download the appropriate fixed release for your branch from the Juniper Networks support portal
- Upgrade the device to the fixed version using 'request system software add' command with the appropriate package
- Reboot the device after upgrade completes using 'request system reboot' command
- Verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm FPCs are online with 'show chassis fpc'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0203 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data