CVE-2026-0239
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn information disclosure vulnerability in the Chronosphere Chronocollector enables an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the collector service to retrieve sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn information disclosure vulnerability in Chronosphere Chronocollector allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the collector service to retrieve sensitive information. The vulnerability stems from insufficient access controls on the collector component, enabling unauthenticated network-based exfiltration of data that should be protected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.116.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Chronosphere Collector installationLocate the Chronosphere Collector service or binary in your environment. Check for processes named 'chronocollector' or files under typical installation paths such as /opt/chronosphere/ or /usr/local/bin/chronocollector. Query running services or container images for the collector component.Affected if Chronosphere Collector is present and running in the environment
-
Determine installed collector versionRun the command 'chronocollector --version' or check the package/version file in the installation directory. Compare the version number against the affected range of versions prior to 0.116.0.Affected if The installed version is lower than 0.116.0
-
Verify network exposure of collector serviceCheck network configuration to determine if the Chronocollector service port is listening on a network interface accessible to unauthenticated attackers. Use commands like 'netstat -tlnp' or 'ss -tlnp' to identify listening ports, and review firewall or security group rules controlling access to the collector.Affected if The collector service is bound to a non-localhost interface and accessible from untrusted network paths
-
Inspect access control configurationExamine the Chronocollector configuration files for authentication settings and access control rules. Look for authentication enforcement flags, API key requirements, or allowed source IP configurations in the collector configuration.Affected if Authentication is disabled or access controls are not enforced, allowing unauthenticated requests to the collector endpoint
You are affected if Chronosphere Collector versions below 0.116.0 are running and the collector service is network-accessible without authentication or proper access controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.116.0
Implement authentication and proper access controls on the Chronocollector service, and restrict network access to trusted sources to prevent unauthenticated information disclosure.
Chronosphere Collector version 0.116.0 or later
- 1. Identify all deployed instances of Chronosphere Collector in your environment
- 2. Check the current version of each Collector instance using the collector's version command or administration interface
- 3. Plan an upgrade to version 0.116.0 or later for all affected Collectors (versions below 0.116.0)
- 4. Review the Chronosphere upgrade documentation for Collector version 0.116.0
- 5. Execute the upgrade procedure according to Chronosphere's official upgrade guide
- 6. After upgrading, verify the Collector is running version 0.116.0 or higher
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by testing that unauthenticated network requests no longer return sensitive information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0239 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0239 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data