CVE-2026-0251
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app allow a local user to escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on Windows and root on macOS and Linux. This enables a non-administrative user to execute arbitrary commands with administrative privileges. The GlobalProtect app on iOS, Android, Chrome OS and GlobalProtect UWP app are not affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePalo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app contains multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities allowing a non-administrative local user to gain NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM privileges on Windows or root privileges on macOS and Linux. The vulnerability enables arbitrary command execution with administrative privileges through unspecified flaws in the application's privilege handling mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.11>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.13>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.8>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.3= 6.2.8= 6.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify operating systemRun 'systeminfo' on Windows or 'uname -a' on macOS/Linux to confirm the OS typeAffected if Running Windows, macOS, or Linux with GlobalProtect installed
-
Locate GlobalProtect installationOn Windows check C:\Program Files\Palo Alto Networks\GlobalProtect or C:\Program Files (x86)\Palo Alto Networks\GlobalProtect; on macOS check /Applications/GlobalProtect.app; on Linux check /usr/local/globalprotect or /opt/paloaltonetworks/globalprotectAffected if GlobalProtect software is present on the system
-
Determine installed GlobalProtect versionOn Windows check the version property of panGPA.exe or panGpd.exe in the installation folder, or look in Add/Remove Programs; on macOS right-click GlobalProtect.app and select Get Info to see the version; on Linux run 'dpkg -l | grep globalprotect' or 'rpm -qa | grep globalprotect'Affected if Version matches one of the affected ranges: 6.0.x before 6.0.11, 6.2.x before or equal to 6.2.8, 6.3.x before or equal to 6.3.3
-
Verify GlobalProtect service/process is runningOn Windows run 'services.msc' and look for 'GlobalProtect' service or run 'tasklist | findstr -i pan'; on macOS run 'ps aux | grep -i global'; on Linux run 'systemctl status globalprotect' or 'ps aux | grep -i pan'Affected if GlobalProtect service or process is active on the system
The system is affected if GlobalProtect is installed with a version in the ranges 6.0.0-6.0.10, 6.2.0-6.2.8, or 6.3.0-6.3.3 and the application is actively running on Windows, macOS, or Linux.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.0.116.0.136.2.8
Apply the vendor-supplied patch for GlobalProtect app when available. Until patched, restrict local access to trusted users and monitor for unauthorized privilege escalation attempts.
GlobalProtect 6.0.11+, 6.2.8+, or 6.3.3+ depending on your current branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed GlobalProtect version by checking the application or system information
- 2. Determine which version branch your current installation belongs to (6.0.x, 6.2.x, or 6.3.x)
- 3. For version 6.0.x: Upgrade to version 6.0.11 or later (or 6.0.13 if available for your branch)
- 4. For version 6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.8 or later
- 5. For version 6.3.x: Upgrade to version 6.3.3 or later
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new GlobalProtect version
- 7. Test that the GlobalProtect VPN functionality continues to work as expected after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0251 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0251 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data