CVE-2026-0262
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple denial of service vulnerabilities in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending specially crafted network traffic. Panorama and Cloud NGFW are not impacted by these vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple denial of service vulnerabilities in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to cause a DoS condition by sending specially crafted network traffic. The vulnerabilities are network-based and require no authentication, making them remotely exploitable. Panorama and Cloud NGFW are explicitly not affected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.2.7>= 10.2.8, < 10.2.10>= 10.2.11, < 10.2.13>= 10.2.14, < 10.2.16= 10.2.7= 10.2.10= 10.2.13= 10.2.16= 10.2.17= 10.2.18>= 11.1.0, < 11.1.4>= 11.1.5, < 11.1.6all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PAN-OS version installedLog into the PAN-OS management interface or use the CLI command 'show system info' to retrieve the installed PAN-OS versionAffected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: < 10.2.7, 10.2.8-10.2.9, 10.2.11-10.2.12, 10.2.14-10.2.15, 10.2.16, 10.2.17, 10.2.18, 11.1.0-11.1.3, or 11.1.5 (versions 11.1.4 and 11.1.6+ are not affected)
-
Verify network exposure of the PAN-OS deviceReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the PAN-OS management interface or control plane is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if The device management interface or control plane is directly exposed to the internet or untrusted networks without proper access controls
-
Check for Siemens Ruggedcom Ape1808 firmware versionAccess the Ruggedcom Ape1808 device through its management interface or use the command 'show version' via console/SSH to identify the firmware versionAffected if Any version of Siemens Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware is installed, as all versions are affected
-
Determine if device is responding to malformed packetsMonitor device logs and responsiveness after receiving unusual network packets on interfaces; check system logs for crash or restart eventsAffected if The device becomes unresponsive, crashes, or exhibits unexpected behavior when receiving specially crafted network packets from an unauthenticated source
-
Review system logs for DoS indicatorsExamine PAN-OS system logs, crash dumps, and management plane status for entries indicating denial of service events or unexpected restartsAffected if Logs show unexplained device crashes, core dumps, or service interruptions coinciding with network packet receipt from untrusted sources
A user is affected if they are running any PAN-OS version within the listed vulnerable ranges or any version of Siemens Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware, and the device is network-accessible to unauthenticated attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.2.710.2.1010.2.13
Apply the vendor-supplied PAN-OS update/patch to address the DoS vulnerabilities; until then, consider network segmentation and filtering to limit exposure to untrusted network paths.
PAN-OS 10.2.16 or later (for 10.2.x line); contact Siemens for Ruggedcom Ape1808
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS version installed on the firewall or Panorama appliance by navigating to Device > Support
- 2. For PAN-OS versions below 10.2.7: Upgrade directly to PAN-OS 10.2.16 or later
- 3. For PAN-OS 10.2.8 - 10.2.9: Upgrade to PAN-OS 10.2.16 or later
- 4. For PAN-OS 10.2.10 - 10.2.12: Upgrade to PAN-OS 10.2.16 or later
- 5. For PAN-OS 10.2.14 - 10.2.15: Upgrade to PAN-OS 10.2.16 or later
- 6. For Ruggedcom Ape1808: Contact Siemens for patch/mitigation; no fixed firmware version is publicly documented
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by confirming the PAN-OS version and testing network functionality
- 8. Implement network segmentation or access controls to limit exposure to unauthenticated attackers until upgrade is complete
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-0262 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-0262 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data